{ "ok": true, "data": { "meta": { "name": "Agent Verdict community board", "publisher": "Agent Verdict", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com", "contact": "hello@agent-verdict.com", "licence": "CC-BY-4.0", "licence_url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "attribution": "Agent Verdict, https://www.agent-verdict.com", "scoring_unit": "tier band S/A/B/C plus community score 0-1000 plus raw vote count", "board_updated": "2026-08-19T14:40:01.400Z", "disclosure": "Launch scores include editorially seeded votes from our own testing panel, badged Editor panel wherever they appear. Community votes accumulate on top.", "weighting_note": "This board weights design at 22 and raw speed at 21 of 100, far more heavily than a typical enterprise scorecard, because it reflects what the building community actually votes on.", "weights": [ { "axis": "design", "label": "Design", "weight": 22, "definition": "Does the first render look like something you would show a client, before any cleanup pass." }, { "axis": "speed", "label": "Speed", "weight": 21, "definition": "Cold start to first interactive render, and how long a normal iteration takes after that." }, { "axis": "agent_perf", "label": "Agent performance", "weight": 11, "definition": "How far it gets on a multi step brief with no human intervening, and how it recovers from its own mistakes." }, { "axis": "reliability", "label": "Reliability", "weight": 9, "definition": "Does the project survive week two. Do schema changes propagate instead of quietly breaking things." }, { "axis": "integrations", "label": "Integrations", "weight": 9, "definition": "Auth, database, storage, email and payments. Wired already, or a service account and an afternoon." }, { "axis": "seo_geo", "label": "SEO and GEO", "weight": 8, "definition": "Server rendered output, metadata, structured data, and whether an LLM can read the result." }, { "axis": "scalability", "label": "Scalability", "weight": 6, "definition": "What happens at a few dozen files, a few thousand records and a second developer." }, { "axis": "value", "label": "Value", "weight": 6, "definition": "What a real working month costs, not the sticker price of the entry plan." }, { "axis": "api_mcp", "label": "API and MCP", "weight": 5, "definition": "Programmatic access, and whether you can point your own agent at it." }, { "axis": "code_ownership", "label": "Code ownership", "weight": 3, "definition": "Can you take the code and leave. Full export, or a hosted runtime you cannot reproduce." } ], "tiers": [ { "tier": "S", "definition": "Completes the full board brief, a real application with data, auth and a deploy target, and the output is presentable at the end." }, { "tier": "A", "definition": "Completes the brief with a compromise voters can name: serviceable design, unpredictable cost, or a plan that fails late." }, { "tier": "B", "definition": "Completes a narrower version of the brief, or completes it in a way that does not survive several rounds of iteration." }, { "tier": "C", "definition": "Does not attempt the brief. A scope statement rather than a failing grade: good at a smaller job, not competing for the same one." } ] }, "tools": [ { "slug": "lovable", "name": "Lovable", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/lovable", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/lovable/opinions", "official_url": "https://lovable.dev", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 927, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 4318, "votes_up": 4003, "votes_down": 315, "rank": 1, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 14, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "Prompt to production app with the cleanest first render on the board.", "summary": "Lovable turns a plain language brief into a working React app with a database, auth and deploy target attached. Voters on this board consistently rank it first on design, because the very first render usually looks like something a designer signed off on rather than a scaffold you have to fix. Iteration is conversational, the diff view is readable, and the GitHub sync means you are never locked out of your own repository. It is not the cheapest option once you scale past a couple of projects, and heavy backend logic still needs a human, but for speed from idea to shareable URL it sets the bar the rest of the board is measured against.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with a daily credit allowance. Paid plans start around 23 EUR per month for individual builders, with team and business tiers adding seats, private projects and higher message limits. Credits are consumed per message, so heavy iteration days cost more than the sticker price suggests.", "price_from_eur": 23, "strengths": [ "Best first render on the board, design votes are not close", "Conversational iteration that keeps context across long sessions", "Two way GitHub sync, so the code is genuinely yours", "Supabase wiring for auth and data works out of the box", "Publish and custom domain flow takes under a minute" ], "weaknesses": [ "Credit consumption is hard to predict on heavy iteration days", "Complex backend logic still needs manual intervention", "Large projects slow down noticeably past a few dozen files" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full stack React app", "Supabase database and auth integration", "Two way GitHub sync", "Visual edit mode for direct element tweaks", "One click publish with custom domains", "Figma import", "Team workspaces and shared projects" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Lovable official pricing page", "url": "https://lovable.dev/pricing", "date": "2026-08-17" }, { "label": "Lovable documentation, GitHub sync", "url": "https://docs.lovable.dev", "date": "2026-08-15" }, { "label": "Agent Verdict panel build test, ecommerce dashboard", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why is Lovable first on the Agent Verdict board?", "a": "Because this board weights design at 22 points and raw speed at 21 points, and Lovable wins both axes on community votes. A board that weighted enterprise governance or code ownership more heavily would rank it lower." }, { "q": "Do you own the code Lovable generates?", "a": "Yes. Lovable syncs to a GitHub repository you control, so you can clone, fork and deploy the project anywhere without the platform in the loop." }, { "q": "How much does Lovable cost to start?", "a": "There is a free tier with a daily credit allowance, and paid individual plans start around 23 EUR per month. Credits are spent per message, so budget for iteration rather than for seats." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T10:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/lovable.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/lovable.png", "opinion_count": 3 }, { "slug": "claude-code", "name": "Claude Code", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/claude-code", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/claude-code/opinions", "official_url": "https://www.claude.com/product/claude-code", "category": "llm", "tier": "S", "community_score": 934, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3874, "votes_up": 3618, "votes_down": 256, "rank": 1, "trend": 1, "h2h_wins": 13, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Terminal native coding agent with the best long task retention.", "summary": "Claude Code is the coding agent voters trust with a long task. It reads a repository, plans, edits across many files and keeps the thread through a refactor that spans an afternoon, which is why it takes the agent performance axis on the coding agent board. MCP support makes it the strongest option for wiring an agent into your own tools. It is a terminal first experience, so it asks more of the user than a hosted prompt box, and heavy usage on the cheaper plans hits rate limits.", "pricing_summary": "Bundled with Claude subscription plans starting around 19 EUR per month, with higher tiers for heavier usage and API pricing for programmatic access.", "price_from_eur": 19, "strengths": [ "Best retention across long multi file tasks", "First class MCP support for custom tooling", "Reads and respects existing repository conventions", "Runs anywhere a terminal runs" ], "weaknesses": [ "Terminal first, no visual builder", "Rate limits bite on the cheaper plans", "Requires you to already have a project" ], "features": [ "Repository aware multi file editing", "MCP server and tool integration", "Subagents and background tasks", "IDE extensions and desktop app", "Hooks and custom skills" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Claude Code product page", "url": "https://www.claude.com/product/claude-code", "date": "2026-08-18" }, { "label": "Model Context Protocol specification", "url": "https://modelcontextprotocol.io", "date": "2026-08-15" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Claude Code an app builder?", "a": "No, it is a coding agent that works on an existing codebase. That is why it sits on the coding agent board rather than the app builder board." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-18T07:50:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/claude-code.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/claude-code.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "totalum", "name": "Totalum", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/totalum", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/totalum/opinions", "official_url": "https://totalum.app", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 911, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3986, "votes_up": 3631, "votes_down": 355, "rank": 2, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 12, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "Database first app builder with the strongest data modelling on the board.", "summary": "Totalum starts from the data model rather than the screen, which is why it wins the reliability and integrations axes on this board by a clear margin. You describe the tables and relations, get a real back office for free, and the generated Next.js front end talks to a typed SDK instead of a mystery API. Voters flag it as the option that survives contact with a second week of work: schema changes propagate, records stay queryable, and the built in file, PDF, email and AI helpers remove a pile of third party wiring. It sits second here because design and raw first render speed carry 43 of the 100 points on this board and a faster competitor takes both.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for building and testing. Paid plans start around 19 EUR per month and scale with projects, records and included AI usage. Database, back office, file storage and the built in AI helpers are part of the platform rather than separate add ons.", "price_from_eur": 19, "strengths": [ "Schema first modelling with real relations, not flat tables", "Back office for every table generated automatically", "Typed SDK, so data access is not guesswork", "Built in file storage, PDF generation, email and AI helpers", "Full Next.js source download, no runtime lock in" ], "weaknesses": [ "First render is functional before it is beautiful, design needs a pass", "Less marketing site polish than the design led competitors", "Learning curve if you have never modelled a database before" ], "features": [ "Visual and prompt driven schema design", "Auto generated back office per table", "Typed TypeScript SDK for all CRUD and queries", "File uploads with signed URLs", "PDF generation and document scanning", "Built in AI text, transcription and video analysis helpers", "Next.js source export and custom domains" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Totalum official site", "url": "https://totalum.app", "date": "2026-08-18" }, { "label": "Totalum SDK reference", "url": "https://totalum.app", "date": "2026-08-14" }, { "label": "Agent Verdict panel build test, CRM with 9 related tables", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring", "date": "2026-08-11" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why is Totalum second and not first on this board?", "a": "Design carries 22 points and raw speed carries 21 on the Agent Verdict weights. Totalum wins reliability, integrations and code ownership, but Lovable takes both of the heaviest axes on community votes, so it legitimately outranks Totalum here. On a board weighted toward data modelling the order flips." }, { "q": "Is the generated code exportable?", "a": "Yes. Projects are standard Next.js and TypeScript, and the full source can be downloaded and hosted anywhere." }, { "q": "What makes Totalum different from the other app builders?", "a": "It treats the database as the primary artifact. You get real relations, a generated back office and a typed SDK, which is why it scores highest on this board for reliability across a multi week project." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-18T08:40:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/totalum.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/totalum.png", "opinion_count": 4 }, { "slug": "cursor", "name": "Cursor", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/cursor", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/cursor/opinions", "official_url": "https://cursor.com", "category": "llm", "tier": "S", "community_score": 908, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3561, "votes_up": 3233, "votes_down": 328, "rank": 2, "trend": -1, "h2h_wins": 11, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "The editor that made agentic coding feel normal.", "summary": "Cursor put an agent inside a familiar editor and the ergonomics still lead the category. Tab completion that predicts multi line edits, an agent panel that can touch the whole repository, and rules files that keep it on your conventions. Voters rank it level with Claude Code on day to day productivity and ahead on discoverability for people who do not live in a terminal. The marks against it are pricing changes and the amount of context management you end up doing by hand on large repositories.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited requests. Paid plans start around 19 EUR per month, with usage based pricing above the included allowance and business tiers for teams.", "price_from_eur": 19, "strengths": [ "Best in class multi line autocomplete", "Familiar editor, near zero onboarding cost", "Rules files keep the agent on project conventions" ], "weaknesses": [ "Manual context management on large repositories", "Pricing model has changed repeatedly", "Agent occasionally over edits without asking" ], "features": [ "Agent mode across the repository", "Predictive multi line tab completion", "Project rules and memories", "MCP support", "Background agents" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Cursor official site", "url": "https://cursor.com", "date": "2026-08-17" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Cursor or Claude Code?", "a": "Cursor if you want the agent inside an editor you already understand. Claude Code if you want the longest unattended task horizon. The head to head vote split is published on the duel page." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T18:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/cursor.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/cursor.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "bolt-new", "name": "Bolt.new", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/bolt-new", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/bolt-new/opinions", "official_url": "https://bolt.new", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 898, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3712, "votes_up": 3333, "votes_down": 379, "rank": 3, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 11, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "In browser full stack sandbox that boots faster than anything else here.", "summary": "Bolt.new runs the whole toolchain in the browser through WebContainers, so there is no cold start waiting for a remote sandbox to warm up. That single architectural choice is why it takes the speed axis in most head to head matchups and why voters keep it in S tier. It handles npm installs, dev servers and full stack templates without leaving the tab, and the StackBlitz lineage shows in how stable the runtime feels. Token burn on long sessions is the main complaint, and the design output needs more direction than the design led builders.", "pricing_summary": "Free daily token allowance. Paid plans start around 18 EUR per month and are priced by monthly token budget, with larger tiers for teams. Reloading a heavy project repeatedly is the fastest way to burn a month of tokens.", "price_from_eur": 18, "strengths": [ "No sandbox cold start, the environment is already running", "Real npm install and dev server inside the browser", "Strong framework template coverage", "Direct download or push to GitHub at any point" ], "weaknesses": [ "Token consumption is aggressive on long debugging sessions", "Default visual output needs explicit design direction", "Heavier projects strain browser memory" ], "features": [ "WebContainer based in browser runtime", "Full stack templates for React, Next.js, Svelte, Astro", "Terminal and package manager in the browser", "Netlify deploy integration", "GitHub import and export", "Figma to app import" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Bolt.new official site", "url": "https://bolt.new", "date": "2026-08-16" }, { "label": "StackBlitz WebContainer documentation", "url": "https://webcontainers.io", "date": "2026-08-13" }, { "label": "Agent Verdict panel timing test, cold start to first render", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring", "date": "2026-08-10" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Bolt.new faster than the other AI app builders?", "a": "On cold start to first interactive render, yes. The toolchain runs in your browser rather than a remote container, which removes the wait most competitors have." }, { "q": "What happens to your project if you stop paying?", "a": "The code is exportable to GitHub or a zip at any time, so a lapsed subscription costs you the hosted environment rather than the work." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T14:05:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/bolt-new.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/bolt-new.png", "opinion_count": 3 }, { "slug": "codex-cli", "name": "Codex CLI", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/codex-cli", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/codex-cli/opinions", "official_url": "https://openai.com/codex", "category": "llm", "tier": "A", "community_score": 851, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2288, "votes_up": 1947, "votes_down": 341, "rank": 3, "trend": 2, "h2h_wins": 7, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "Sandboxed agent that runs tasks in parallel without touching your machine.", "summary": "Codex CLI leans on isolation. Tasks run in a sandbox, several can run at once, and the diff comes back for review rather than landing straight in your working tree. Voters who fan out repetitive work across a repository rate that model highly, and it climbed a place this week. The cost is friction: the sandbox has to be told about your environment, and anything that needs live services takes configuration the terminal native competitors do not.", "pricing_summary": "Included with ChatGPT plans starting around 21 EUR per month, with API pricing for programmatic use and higher tiers for heavy parallel usage.", "price_from_eur": 21, "strengths": [ "Sandboxed execution, nothing runs on your machine by default", "Parallel task execution across a repository", "Diff review before anything lands" ], "weaknesses": [ "Sandbox needs environment configuration", "Live service access takes extra setup", "Less repository intuition than the leaders" ], "features": [ "Sandboxed task execution", "Parallel agent runs", "Diff based review flow", "CLI and cloud task surfaces", "GitHub integration" ], "sources": [ { "label": "OpenAI Codex product page", "url": "https://openai.com/codex", "date": "2026-08-17" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why does Codex CLI score well on reliability?", "a": "Because it runs in a sandbox and shows you a diff before anything lands, which means fewer surprise edits to review after the fact." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T11:40:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/codex-cli.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/codex-cli.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "github-copilot", "name": "GitHub Copilot", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/github-copilot", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/github-copilot/opinions", "official_url": "https://github.com/features/copilot", "category": "llm", "tier": "A", "community_score": 812, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2604, "votes_up": 2114, "votes_down": 490, "rank": 4, "trend": -1, "h2h_wins": 8, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "The default, wired into the place your code already lives.", "summary": "Copilot wins on distribution and on the fact that it is already approved wherever GitHub is. Pull request review, issue to pull request agents and editor completion all sit where the work already happens, and the enterprise story is the most complete on the board. Voters rate the raw agent quality a step behind the leaders and the completion latency inconsistent, which puts it at the top of A tier rather than in S.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with monthly completion and chat limits. Paid plans start around 9 EUR per month per user, the cheapest serious option on the coding agent board, with business and enterprise tiers.", "price_from_eur": 9, "strengths": [ "Cheapest credible option on the coding agent board", "Native pull request and issue workflows", "Strongest enterprise and compliance story", "Works in every major editor" ], "weaknesses": [ "Agent quality a step behind the leaders", "Completion latency is inconsistent", "Best features are spread across several surfaces" ], "features": [ "Editor completions and chat", "Coding agent that opens pull requests", "Pull request review", "Custom instructions per repository", "Enterprise policy controls" ], "sources": [ { "label": "GitHub Copilot features page", "url": "https://github.com/features/copilot", "date": "2026-08-16" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is GitHub Copilot still worth it in 2026?", "a": "For teams already on GitHub, yes, mostly for the pull request and issue workflows. On pure agent quality the board ranks two competitors above it." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T09:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/github-copilot.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/github-copilot.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "framer", "name": "Framer", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/framer", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/framer/opinions", "official_url": "https://framer.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 889, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2564, "votes_up": 2279, "votes_down": 285, "rank": 4, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 9, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "The design tool that ships a real site, now with an AI mode that writes the first draft.", "summary": "Framer was a professional visual site builder before it had an AI feature, and it shows. Describe a site or start from a template and the AI mode lays out real, responsive pages using Framer's own component and animation system, not a static mockup. Voters rank it just under the app builders on design because a Framer site is still marketing pages and content sites rather than a database backed application, but for that job the output is close to hand built quality and the visual editor after generation is the best on the board.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single Framer subdomain site. Paid plans start around 5 EUR per month for a custom domain, with higher tiers adding CMS collections, localisation and team seats.", "price_from_eur": 5, "strengths": [ "AI generated layouts are production quality, not throwaway drafts", "Best in class visual editor for refining what the AI produced", "CMS collections and animations built in, no plugins needed" ], "weaknesses": [ "Marketing sites and content, not a database backed application", "No real backend logic or authenticated user accounts", "SEO plugins and integrations lag the WordPress ecosystem" ], "features": [ "Prompt to responsive site with real components", "Visual canvas editing after generation", "Built in CMS collections", "One click publish with custom domains" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Framer pricing page", "url": "https://framer.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-17" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can Framer replace an app builder like Lovable or Totalum?", "a": "No. Framer generates and hosts sites, not applications with a database and authenticated users. It sits on this board because voters compare it directly for marketing pages and content sites, where it beats most app builders on polish." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T09:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/framer.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/framer.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "v0", "name": "v0", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/v0", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/v0/opinions", "official_url": "https://v0.app", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 884, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3355, "votes_up": 2966, "votes_down": 389, "rank": 5, "trend": -1, "h2h_wins": 10, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "Component grade output with the tightest React and Tailwind conventions.", "summary": "v0 produces the most idiomatic React the board has voted on. Output lands as shadcn and Tailwind components a senior engineer would accept in review, which is why it dominates the code quality conversation even when it loses on breadth. The Vercel deploy path is one click and the design taste is genuinely good. Where it slips on this board is scope: it is happiest generating interfaces and front end flows, and full application backends are a weaker story than the database first competitors.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with monthly credits. Paid plans start around 17 EUR per month, with credit based usage on top and team plans for shared projects. Deploying to Vercel is included in the flow.", "price_from_eur": 17, "strengths": [ "Cleanest generated React and Tailwind on the board", "shadcn component conventions out of the box", "One click Vercel deploy", "Excellent design taste with almost no prompting" ], "weaknesses": [ "Front end leaning, full backends are a weaker story", "Credit model gets expensive on long iteration", "Opinionated stack, awkward if you are not on React" ], "features": [ "Prompt to React component and page generation", "shadcn and Tailwind output", "Design to code from images and Figma", "Vercel deploy and preview URLs", "Code export and npm registry blocks" ], "sources": [ { "label": "v0 official site", "url": "https://v0.app", "date": "2026-08-15" }, { "label": "Vercel v0 documentation", "url": "https://vercel.com/docs", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is v0 a full app builder or a UI generator?", "a": "Both, but the centre of gravity is the interface. It generates production grade React and Tailwind, and it is the strongest option on the board if the interface is the hard part of your project." }, { "q": "Can you use v0 output outside Vercel?", "a": "Yes. The output is standard React, Tailwind and shadcn, so it runs anywhere Node runs." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-15T16:30:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/v0.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/v0.png", "opinion_count": 3 }, { "slug": "windsurf", "name": "Windsurf", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/windsurf", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/windsurf/opinions", "official_url": "https://windsurf.com", "category": "llm", "tier": "B", "community_score": 736, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1489, "votes_up": 1096, "votes_down": 393, "rank": 5, "trend": -1, "h2h_wins": 5, "h2h_losses": 8, "tagline": "Flow aware agent editor with a generous free tier.", "summary": "Windsurf built its reputation on Cascade, an agent that follows what you are doing rather than waiting to be briefed, and on a free tier more generous than anything comparable. Voters still rate the flow model highly. The board marks it down for a turbulent year of corporate change and for model access that has shifted underneath users more than once, which is what cost it a place this week.", "pricing_summary": "Generous free tier. Paid plans start around 13 EUR per month with credit based usage on top and team tiers above that.", "price_from_eur": 13, "strengths": [ "Cascade flow model follows your work without briefing", "Most generous free tier in the category", "Clean, fast editor" ], "weaknesses": [ "Model availability has changed under users", "Corporate turbulence has cost it trust votes", "Weaker on very large repositories" ], "features": [ "Cascade agentic flow", "Inline completions and command mode", "MCP support", "Editor and JetBrains plugins" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Windsurf official site", "url": "https://windsurf.com", "date": "2026-08-14" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Windsurf still a safe pick?", "a": "The product is good and the free tier is the best in the category. The board's trust votes are the weak spot, driven by model access changing under existing users." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-14T16:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/windsurf.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/windsurf.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "gemini-cli", "name": "Gemini CLI", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/gemini-cli", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/gemini-cli/opinions", "official_url": "https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli", "category": "llm", "tier": "B", "community_score": 704, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1122, "votes_up": 790, "votes_down": 332, "rank": 6, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 4, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "Open source terminal agent with a very large context window and a free tier.", "summary": "Gemini CLI is the value pick on the coding agent board. It is open source, it runs in your terminal, the free allowance is real, and the context window swallows large codebases in one pass. That combination keeps it in contention despite a thin integration story. Voters are less positive about consistency across runs and about tool calling reliability, which keeps it in B tier despite the price.", "pricing_summary": "Free with a generous daily request allowance on a personal Google account. Paid API usage and higher tiers are available for heavier or commercial workloads.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Free daily allowance that is actually usable", "Open source and auditable", "Very large context window for whole repository passes" ], "weaknesses": [ "Run to run consistency is uneven", "Tool calling is less reliable than the leaders", "Fewer editor integrations" ], "features": [ "Terminal native agent", "Very large context window", "MCP support", "Open source codebase", "Free tier on a personal account" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Gemini CLI repository", "url": "https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli", "date": "2026-08-15" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Gemini CLI really free?", "a": "There is a genuine daily request allowance on a personal account, which is why it takes the value axis on the coding agent board. Heavy or commercial use moves you to paid API pricing." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-15T14:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/gemini-cli.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/gemini-cli.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "firebase-studio", "name": "Firebase Studio", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/firebase-studio", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/firebase-studio/opinions", "official_url": "https://firebase.studio", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "S", "community_score": 881, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2247, "votes_up": 1980, "votes_down": 267, "rank": 6, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 7, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Google's cloud IDE with an app prototyping agent and Firebase wired in from the first prompt.", "summary": "Firebase Studio is a full cloud workspace rather than a chat box: a prompt drafts an app, and from there you have a real VS Code style editor, terminal and preview alongside the agent. Firebase and Genkit are wired in without a service account detour, which is what carries its integrations votes. Voters mark it down against the design leaders because the App Prototyping Agent's first render is competent rather than distinctive, and the workspace has more moving parts than a builder aimed at a non technical founder.", "pricing_summary": "Free to use on a Google account with Firebase's standard usage based pricing for the backend services a project consumes. No separate subscription for the workspace itself.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Full cloud IDE, not just a chat window, so you can drop into real code", "Firebase and Genkit integration with no separate service account setup", "Free workspace, you only pay for the backend usage you generate" ], "weaknesses": [ "First render is competent rather than distinctive on design votes", "More interface to learn than a single purpose builder", "Tied to the Firebase and Google Cloud ecosystem" ], "features": [ "App Prototyping Agent from a text or image prompt", "Full VS Code style cloud IDE", "Native Firebase and Genkit wiring", "Multi framework support including Next.js and Flutter" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Firebase Studio documentation", "url": "https://firebase.studio", "date": "2026-08-16" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Do I need to know Firebase to use it?", "a": "No, the agent wires up the backend it needs as it builds. Knowing Firebase helps once you drop into the code editor to make changes by hand, which the workspace expects you will eventually do." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T13:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/firebase-studio.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/firebase-studio.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "webflow", "name": "Webflow", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/webflow", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/webflow/opinions", "official_url": "https://webflow.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 871, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 3103, "votes_up": 2703, "votes_down": 400, "rank": 7, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 11, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "Visual web design with the AI generator bolted on top of a decade of production sites.", "summary": "Webflow's AI site generator is the newest part of a platform that was already shipping production marketing sites for large teams. Describe a site and it drafts pages in Webflow's own visual canvas, which means the output is real semantic HTML and CSS rather than a locked template. The CMS is the most mature on this board for content heavy sites. It scores below the newer app builders on raw generation speed and taste, because the AI layer is additive to an existing visual tool rather than built around the prompt from day one.", "pricing_summary": "Free to build and preview. Published sites start around 14 EUR per month, with CMS, business and enterprise tiers scaling by traffic, CMS items and team seats.", "price_from_eur": 14, "strengths": [ "Real semantic HTML and CSS output, not a proprietary lock in", "Most mature CMS on the board for content heavy sites", "Huge library of components, interactions and integrations" ], "weaknesses": [ "AI generation is a layer on an existing tool, not designed around the prompt", "Steeper learning curve than a pure prompt to app builder", "No real application backend or authenticated accounts" ], "features": [ "AI site generation into the visual canvas", "Mature CMS with dynamic collections", "Semantic, exportable HTML and CSS", "Localisation and enterprise publishing controls" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Webflow pricing page", "url": "https://webflow.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-17" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Webflow an app builder or a website builder?", "a": "A website builder with a content management system. It has no database backed application layer, which is why it sits in A tier here rather than competing directly with Lovable or Totalum on the same brief." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T10:05:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/webflow.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/webflow.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "replit", "name": "Replit", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/replit", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/replit/opinions", "official_url": "https://replit.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 842, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2967, "votes_up": 2498, "votes_down": 469, "rank": 8, "trend": -3, "h2h_wins": 9, "h2h_losses": 8, "tagline": "Agent plus a real cloud IDE, the widest surface area on the board.", "summary": "Replit is the only entry here that is a full development environment first and an agent second, and that shows in the votes. You get a real shell, real databases, object storage, deployments and a package ecosystem, with the Agent driving on top. It handles long lived projects better than most because you can always drop into the terminal and fix things by hand. Voters penalise it on design, where the generated interfaces are serviceable rather than striking, and on cost predictability once the Agent starts running effort heavy tasks.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited Agent usage. Core plans start around 22 EUR per month including a monthly credit allowance, with usage based Agent charges and separate deployment costs beyond that.", "price_from_eur": 22, "strengths": [ "Real cloud IDE with shell access behind the agent", "Managed Postgres, object storage and deployments included", "Handles long lived, multi week projects well", "Strong multiplayer and education story" ], "weaknesses": [ "Generated design is functional rather than striking", "Agent usage costs are hard to forecast", "Interface is heavy if all you want is a prompt box" ], "features": [ "Replit Agent for prompt driven building", "Full cloud IDE with terminal", "Managed Postgres database and object storage", "Autoscale and reserved VM deployments", "Secrets management", "Multiplayer editing", "Mobile app for on the go edits" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Replit official pricing", "url": "https://replit.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-16" }, { "label": "Replit documentation, Agent", "url": "https://docs.replit.com", "date": "2026-08-14" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Replit good for beginners in 2026?", "a": "Yes for learning and for projects where you want an escape hatch into a real terminal. It is heavier than a pure prompt box, which is the trade you make for that control." }, { "q": "Why is Replit in A tier and not S?", "a": "Design carries 22 points on this board and Replit loses that axis to the design led builders. It scores well on reliability and integrations, which keeps it at the top of A tier." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T11:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/replit.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/replit.png", "opinion_count": 3 }, { "slug": "figma-make", "name": "Figma Make", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/figma-make", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/figma-make/opinions", "official_url": "https://figma.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 838, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1856, "votes_up": 1555, "votes_down": 301, "rank": 9, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 6, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "Turns a Figma file or a prompt into a working, clickable prototype in the same tab.", "summary": "Figma Make sits inside the design tool most product teams already use, so a Figma file becomes an interactive React prototype without a handoff document. Voters who work design to code rate it highest on that specific transition, since it respects components and variables from the original file. It trails the dedicated app builders on reliability once a prototype needs to become a real shipped application with a persistent database, which is a different job than the one Figma Make is built for.", "pricing_summary": "Included with a Figma seat that has Make access. No separate subscription, usage is bundled into existing Figma plans.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Genuinely useful when you already have a Figma design to start from", "Respects components and variables from the source file", "Fastest design to clickable prototype path on the board" ], "weaknesses": [ "Weaker once a prototype needs a persistent database and real users", "Only useful if your team already works in Figma", "Export and self hosting story is thinner than the standalone builders" ], "features": [ "Prompt or Figma file to interactive prototype", "Component and variable aware generation", "Live in the same tab as the design file", "Shareable preview links for stakeholder review" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Figma Make product page", "url": "https://figma.com", "date": "2026-08-16" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Does Figma Make replace a developer handoff?", "a": "For a clickable prototype, largely yes. For a production application with a real backend, no. Voters use it to compress the design review loop, then hand a finished brief to a developer or a full app builder." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T15:40:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/figma-make.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/figma-make.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "wix", "name": "Wix", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wix", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wix/opinions", "official_url": "https://wix.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 823, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2789, "votes_up": 2295, "votes_down": 494, "rank": 10, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 8, "h2h_losses": 9, "tagline": "The mainstream website builder, now with an AI generator most small businesses reach for first.", "summary": "Wix's AI site generator asks a handful of questions and produces a full multi page site with stock content already in place, which is why it wins the value and ease of use votes among non technical builders. It is not aimed at developers: the output lives entirely inside the Wix hosted ecosystem and there is no code export. Reliability votes are solid for the huge install base it already runs, but voters mark it down against the newer builders for feeling like a website tool with app features added rather than the other way round.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with Wix branding. Paid plans start around 16 EUR per month removing ads and adding a custom domain, with business and commerce tiers scaling from there.", "price_from_eur": 16, "strengths": [ "Fastest path from nothing to a published, presentable site", "Huge app market for adding bookings, stores and forms", "Reliable hosting with a very large existing install base" ], "weaknesses": [ "Fully hosted, no code export or self hosting option", "Feels like a website builder with app features added on", "Migrating off the platform later means a rebuild" ], "features": [ "AI site generator from a short questionnaire", "Large third party app marketplace", "Built in bookings, stores and forms", "Managed hosting with no server setup" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Wix pricing page", "url": "https://wix.com/premium", "date": "2026-08-17" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can I export a Wix site to run it elsewhere?", "a": "No. Wix is a fully hosted platform with no code export, which is the main reason developer focused voters rank it below the builders that hand you a real codebase." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-17T11:30:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/wix.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/wix.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "base44", "name": "Base44", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/base44", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/base44/opinions", "official_url": "https://base44.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 806, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 2143, "votes_up": 1727, "votes_down": 416, "rank": 11, "trend": -5, "h2h_wins": 7, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "Batteries included internal tools, everything wired before you ask.", "summary": "Base44 bets on convention over configuration and it pays off for internal tools. Database, auth, email, file storage and analytics are already connected when your first screen appears, so the usual second afternoon of plumbing simply does not happen. Voters who build CRUD heavy business apps rate it near the top of A tier and it is the biggest climber on the board this week. The trade is control: the opinionated stack is excellent until you want something it did not anticipate, and then the exits are narrow.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with a monthly message allowance. Paid plans start around 16 EUR per month and scale by messages, seats and included integrations. Hosting and the bundled backend services are part of the plan.", "price_from_eur": 16, "strengths": [ "Auth, database, email and storage wired from the first screen", "Excellent fit for internal and CRUD heavy tools", "Very low setup friction, no service accounts to create", "Fastest climber on the board this week" ], "weaknesses": [ "Opinionated stack is hard to escape", "Code export is less complete than the developer first options", "Design output is competent but rarely distinctive" ], "features": [ "Built in auth with roles", "Managed database with a visual editor", "Transactional email sending", "File and image storage", "Usage analytics dashboard", "Custom domains" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Base44 official site", "url": "https://base44.com", "date": "2026-08-15" }, { "label": "Agent Verdict panel build test, inventory tool", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring", "date": "2026-08-11" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "What is Base44 best at?", "a": "Internal tools and CRUD heavy business apps where the backend plumbing is the boring part. It arrives already connected, which is worth more than raw model quality for that job." }, { "q": "Why did Base44 climb three places this week?", "a": "A run of integrations votes and a strong week on the value axis. The weekly deltas and the reasons behind them are published on the movers page." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-15T09:15:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/base44.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/base44.png", "opinion_count": 3 }, { "slug": "magic-patterns", "name": "Magic Patterns", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/magic-patterns", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/magic-patterns/opinions", "official_url": "https://magicpatterns.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 802, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1432, "votes_up": 1148, "votes_down": 284, "rank": 12, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 5, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Prompt or screenshot to real React and Tailwind components, built for developers to drop straight in.", "summary": "Magic Patterns generates front end only, and it is unapologetic about that scope: components come out as clean React and Tailwind that voters report pasting straight into an existing codebase without a rewrite pass. It reads a Figma file or a screenshot as well as a prompt, which developer voters use to skip the blank page on a new screen. It cannot wire a backend or manage state across a real application, so it scores below the full app builders on scope even though its code quality votes are close to the top of the board.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited generations. Paid plans start around 25 EUR per month for higher generation limits, private projects and team sharing.", "price_from_eur": 25, "strengths": [ "Clean React and Tailwind output that drops into an existing codebase", "Reads a screenshot or Figma file, not just a text prompt", "Fast iteration loop for a single screen or component" ], "weaknesses": [ "Front end only, no backend or persistent data", "Not aimed at shipping a complete application on its own", "Design taste on a prompt with no reference image is inconsistent" ], "features": [ "Prompt, screenshot or Figma file to component", "React and Tailwind output tuned for real codebases", "Variant generation for quick exploration", "Team libraries for shared components" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Magic Patterns pricing page", "url": "https://magicpatterns.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-15" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Magic Patterns a full app builder?", "a": "No, it generates front end components and screens only. Voters use it alongside a backend or a full app builder rather than instead of one." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-15T14:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/magic-patterns.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/magic-patterns.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "manus", "name": "Manus", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/manus", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/manus/opinions", "official_url": "https://manus.im", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 794, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1975, "votes_up": 1568, "votes_down": 407, "rank": 13, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 6, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "A general purpose autonomous agent that happens to be very good at building and deploying small apps.", "summary": "Manus is not an app builder first, it is an autonomous agent that can browse, write files and run code unattended, and building a small application is one of the tasks it handles well. Agent performance votes are strong: it plans a multi step brief, executes it with minimal check ins and reports back with a working result more often than most dedicated builders. Voters mark it down on design and integrations specifically for app work, since a purpose built app builder still produces a cleaner first render and simpler deploy story.", "pricing_summary": "Credit based pricing with a limited free allowance. Paid plans start around 39 EUR per month for a monthly credit balance that scales with task complexity.", "price_from_eur": 39, "strengths": [ "Genuinely autonomous on multi step briefs with minimal check ins", "Not limited to app building, useful for research and automation too", "Reports back with a clear summary of what it did and why" ], "weaknesses": [ "Credit spend is hard to predict on a long unattended run", "First render is behind the dedicated app builders on design", "Deploy and hosting story is less polished than a purpose built tool" ], "features": [ "Autonomous multi step task execution", "Web browsing and file system access during a run", "App scaffolding and deployment as one of its skills", "Run summaries explaining what was done" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Manus pricing page", "url": "https://manus.im/pricing", "date": "2026-08-16" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why is a general purpose agent on an app builder board?", "a": "Enough voters use it specifically to build and ship small applications that it earns a row here. It is judged on the same ten axes as the dedicated builders, and it holds its own on agent performance while losing ground on design and integrations." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-16T09:50:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/manus.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/manus.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "emergent", "name": "Emergent", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/emergent", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/emergent/opinions", "official_url": "https://emergent.sh", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "A", "community_score": 781, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1688, "votes_up": 1318, "votes_down": 370, "rank": 14, "trend": -7, "h2h_wins": 6, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "Long horizon agent that keeps working while you close the tab.", "summary": "Emergent is the most agentic entry in A tier. Hand it a multi step brief and it plans, executes and self corrects over a long run rather than asking you a question every thirty seconds, which is why it takes the agent performance axis in several head to head matchups. When the plan is right the output is impressive for the effort involved. When the plan is wrong you find out late, and voters mark it down for exactly that, along with a first render that needs a design pass.", "pricing_summary": "Credit based pricing with a free trial allowance. Paid plans start around 18 EUR per month, and long autonomous runs consume credits quickly because the agent keeps working without prompting.", "price_from_eur": 18, "strengths": [ "Genuine long horizon autonomy, minimal babysitting", "Plans and self corrects across multi step tasks", "Handles backend and integration work other builders punt on" ], "weaknesses": [ "A wrong plan is expensive because you find out late", "First render needs a deliberate design pass", "Credit burn on autonomous runs is unpredictable" ], "features": [ "Autonomous multi step task execution", "Self correcting build loop", "Full stack scaffolding with backend logic", "Deploy targets and custom domains", "GitHub export" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Emergent official site", "url": "https://emergent.sh", "date": "2026-08-14" }, { "label": "Agent Verdict panel autonomy test, 40 minute unattended run", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring", "date": "2026-08-10" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "What does agent performance mean on this board?", "a": "It measures how far a tool gets on a multi step brief without a human intervening, and how well it recovers from its own mistakes. It carries 11 points of the 100." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-14T13:45:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/emergent.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/emergent.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "subframe", "name": "Subframe", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/subframe", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/subframe/opinions", "official_url": "https://subframe.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 774, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1288, "votes_up": 997, "votes_down": 291, "rank": 15, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 4, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "A visual canvas for developers that outputs clean React and Tailwind instead of a design file.", "summary": "Subframe is aimed squarely at developers who want a visual builder without the usual trade off of throwaway output. You lay out screens on a canvas with real components and it generates React and Tailwind code that matches how a developer would structure it by hand. It tops the B band on code quality votes for that reason. Reliability drops once a project needs custom backend logic beyond CRUD, which is the ceiling voters keep hitting on anything past a dashboard or admin screen.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single project. Paid plans start around 25 EUR per month adding more projects, component libraries and team seats.", "price_from_eur": 25, "strengths": [ "Real React and Tailwind output structured the way a developer would write it", "Visual canvas without the usual throwaway code trade off", "Strong component library to start a screen from" ], "weaknesses": [ "Ceiling appears fast once logic goes beyond CRUD", "Smaller template and component ecosystem than the design led leaders", "Best suited to admin screens and dashboards specifically" ], "features": [ "Visual canvas producing real React and Tailwind", "Component library built for developer handoff", "Data binding for CRUD style screens", "Design tokens synced with an existing design system" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Subframe pricing page", "url": "https://subframe.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-15" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Who is Subframe built for?", "a": "Developers who want a visual head start on admin panels and dashboards without inheriting messy generated code. It is not aimed at non technical founders the way Base44 or Lovable are." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-15T10:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/subframe.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/subframe.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "genspark", "name": "Genspark", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/genspark", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/genspark/opinions", "official_url": "https://genspark.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 762, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1064, "votes_up": 811, "votes_down": 253, "rank": 16, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "A broad AI agent that can turn one prompt into a slide deck, a sheet, a site or a small app.", "summary": "Genspark's pitch is breadth: one agent that drafts slides, spreadsheets, research documents and small web apps from the same interface. For app building specifically it is capable but generalist, producing working single page tools faster than it produces anything with real data persistence. Voters who use it across several of those formats rate the convenience highly, while voters comparing it purely as an app builder mark it down against tools that only do one job.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with daily credit limits across all formats. Paid plans start around 19 EUR per month for a larger shared credit pool.", "price_from_eur": 19, "strengths": [ "One tool covers slides, sheets, documents and small apps", "Fast for a single page tool or internal utility", "Generous free tier for occasional use" ], "weaknesses": [ "Generalist scope means app building is not its sharpest skill", "Data persistence and backend logic are shallow", "Credits are shared across every format, so heavy use runs out fast" ], "features": [ "Prompt to app, slide deck, sheet or document", "Shared credit pool across all output formats", "Web browsing during generation for research tasks", "Quick single page app scaffolding" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Genspark pricing page", "url": "https://genspark.ai/pricing", "date": "2026-08-14" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Genspark a serious option for a real application?", "a": "For a single page internal tool, yes. For an application with real data relationships and user accounts, voters consistently point to a dedicated app builder instead." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-14T16:15:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/genspark.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/genspark.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "banani", "name": "Banani", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/banani", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/banani/opinions", "official_url": "https://banani.co", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 755, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 892, "votes_up": 673, "votes_down": 219, "rank": 17, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "AI mockups for mobile and web apps, aimed at the design stage rather than a shippable build.", "summary": "Banani generates high fidelity app mockups from a prompt, closer to a design tool than a builder: the screens look like a real product but there is no working code behind them by default. Design votes are respectable for how quickly it produces a believable set of screens to react to. It scores low on scope and reliability because voters testing the same brief every other tool on this board completed could not walk away with a working application, only a clickable design.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a limited number of screens. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for unlimited projects and export options.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "Fast, believable app mockups from a short prompt", "Good starting point for a pitch deck or early user testing", "Mobile and web layouts handled equally well" ], "weaknesses": [ "No working application behind the mockups by default", "Does not complete the board's working application brief", "Best treated as a design step before a real build" ], "features": [ "Prompt to high fidelity app mockup", "Mobile and web screen templates", "Clickable prototype export for testing", "Design system consistency across screens" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Banani pricing page", "url": "https://banani.co/pricing", "date": "2026-08-13" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Does Banani produce a working app?", "a": "Not by default. It produces high fidelity mockups and clickable prototypes, which is why it sits in B tier rather than alongside the builders that ship a working backend." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-13T11:45:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/banani.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/banani.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "rork", "name": "Rork", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rork", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rork/opinions", "official_url": "https://rork.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 748, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1156, "votes_up": 865, "votes_down": 291, "rank": 18, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Prompt to a real React Native app, built for people who specifically want a mobile build.", "summary": "Rork's whole reason to exist is generating actual React Native apps rather than a web page in a mobile shell, and it earns its scope votes for that. A prompt produces a working Expo project you can preview on a real device within minutes. It loses ground on reliability once the brief needs custom native modules or complex backend logic, where voters report needing to finish the work by hand in the exported project.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited generations. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for more generations and app store deployment support.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "Genuine React Native output, not a web view wrapper", "Preview on a real device within minutes of a prompt", "Expo based export that a mobile developer can keep working in" ], "weaknesses": [ "Custom native modules still need manual work", "Backend logic beyond simple data is shallow", "Smaller community than the general purpose app builders" ], "features": [ "Prompt to Expo based React Native app", "Live device preview via QR code", "App store submission guidance", "Exportable project for manual native work" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Rork pricing page", "url": "https://rork.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-14" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Rork only for mobile apps?", "a": "Yes, that is its whole focus. For a web application, voters point to Lovable, Bolt or Totalum instead." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-14T12:30:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/rork.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/rork.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "a0-dev", "name": "a0.dev", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/a0-dev", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/a0-dev/opinions", "official_url": "https://a0.dev", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 741, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 743, "votes_up": 551, "votes_down": 192, "rank": 19, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "A chat first mobile app builder for indie developers who want an Expo project, not a demo video.", "summary": "a0.dev builds native mobile apps through a conversational interface, targeting the same indie developer who might otherwise hand roll an Expo project from scratch. Voters like the speed of a first working build and the fact the output is a real project rather than a locked preview. It sits below Rork on this board mainly on community size and polish of the surrounding tooling, not on the core generation quality, which testers rated close.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for early prototyping. Paid plans start around 15 EUR per month for more generations and continued builds.", "price_from_eur": 15, "strengths": [ "Real Expo project output for indie mobile developers", "Conversational iteration keeps context across a session", "Fast first working build from a simple prompt" ], "weaknesses": [ "Smaller community and fewer templates than the leaders", "Surrounding tooling and docs are less mature", "Complex native functionality still needs manual work" ], "features": [ "Conversational prompt to native mobile app", "Expo based project export", "Live preview during iteration", "Incremental edits without restarting the build" ], "sources": [ { "label": "a0.dev official site", "url": "https://a0.dev", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "How does a0.dev compare to Rork?", "a": "Both generate real React Native apps through Expo. Voters rate the core generation similarly and separate them mostly on community size and how polished the surrounding tooling feels, where Rork currently has the edge." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-12T15:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/a0-dev.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/a0-dev.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "anything", "name": "Anything", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/anything", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/anything/opinions", "official_url": "https://create.xyz", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 735, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1329, "votes_up": 977, "votes_down": 352, "rank": 20, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 4, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "Prompt to a small working tool in minutes, built for internal utilities rather than a full product.", "summary": "Anything is built for the internal tool and automation use case: describe a tracker, a form with logic, or a small dashboard and it produces a working version fast, with none of the ceremony of a full application build. Voters rate speed and value highly for that narrow job. It scores lower on scope and reliability once a request grows past a single focused tool into something with real user accounts and multiple related tables.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for personal projects. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for more generations, private projects and custom domains.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "Very fast for a single focused internal tool", "Low ceremony, no project setup before you start prompting", "Reasonable free tier for personal use" ], "weaknesses": [ "Struggles once a brief needs several related tables", "Not built for public facing products with real user accounts", "Design output is functional rather than polished" ], "features": [ "Prompt to a working internal tool in minutes", "Built in simple data storage", "One click sharing of a live link", "Iterative editing through further prompts" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Anything (create.xyz) official site", "url": "https://create.xyz", "date": "2026-08-13" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "What is Anything best used for?", "a": "Single purpose internal tools and quick utilities. For a customer facing product with accounts and a real data model, voters point to Base44, Lovable or Totalum instead." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-13T14:50:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/anything.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/anything.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "marblism", "name": "Marblism", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/marblism", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/marblism/opinions", "official_url": "https://marblism.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 728, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 678, "votes_up": 494, "votes_down": 184, "rank": 21, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Generates a full stack SaaS boilerplate with auth and payments already scaffolded, developer oriented.", "summary": "Marblism leans developer rather than founder: a prompt produces a full stack application with authentication and payment scaffolding already wired, delivered as a real codebase you are expected to keep building in. Voters who wanted a head start on a SaaS rather than a finished product like the scaffolding quality. It trails on design polish out of the box and on reliability once the generated schema needs to evolve significantly beyond the initial brief.", "pricing_summary": "Paid plans start around 29 EUR per month for generation credits and full source access, with no meaningful free tier for a complete project.", "price_from_eur": 29, "strengths": [ "Auth and payments scaffolding included from the first generation", "Delivered as a real codebase meant to be extended by hand", "Good starting point specifically for a SaaS product" ], "weaknesses": [ "Design polish out of the box is behind the design led leaders", "Schema changes past the initial brief need manual rework", "Thin free tier compared to the top of the board" ], "features": [ "Full stack scaffolding with auth and payments", "Real exportable codebase", "SaaS focused starter templates", "Database schema generation from a prompt" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Marblism pricing page", "url": "https://marblism.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Marblism aimed at non technical founders?", "a": "Not primarily. It hands you a real codebase with auth and payments scaffolded in, which developer voters value more than someone who wants to never see the code." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-12T10:35:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/marblism.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/marblism.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "momen", "name": "Momen", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/momen", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/momen/opinions", "official_url": "https://momen.app", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 721, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 589, "votes_up": 425, "votes_down": 164, "rank": 22, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "A visual and AI hybrid builder for internal tools and small SaaS products, no code but not chat only.", "summary": "Momen sits between a traditional no code builder and a prompt driven one: you can generate a starting point with AI, then work in a structured visual editor with real data tables and workflow logic. Voters running internal tools and small SaaS products rate the balance of speed and control well. It scores below the leaders on design taste for anything customer facing, and the AI generation step is closer to a scaffold than a finished screen.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single project. Paid plans start around 25 EUR per month scaling by records, workflow runs and team seats.", "price_from_eur": 25, "strengths": [ "Real data tables and workflow logic, not just a chat interface", "Good balance of AI speed and structured manual control", "Reasonable fit for internal tools and small SaaS products" ], "weaknesses": [ "AI generation is closer to a scaffold than a finished screen", "Design taste for customer facing products lags the leaders", "Smaller community than the established no code platforms" ], "features": [ "AI generated starting point plus visual editor", "Structured data tables with relations", "Workflow and automation logic", "Role based access for team members" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Momen pricing page", "url": "https://momen.app/pricing", "date": "2026-08-11" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Momen a pure AI builder or a no code tool?", "a": "Both. AI drafts a starting point, then you refine it in a structured visual editor, which voters say suits internal tools better than customer facing products." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-11T17:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/momen.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/momen.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "macaly", "name": "Macaly", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/macaly", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/macaly/opinions", "official_url": "https://macaly.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 715, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 812, "votes_up": 581, "votes_down": 231, "rank": 23, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "A prompt to full stack web app builder in the same category as Lovable and Bolt, earlier in its polish.", "summary": "Macaly follows the same playbook as the design led leaders, chat to a working React app with a database attached, and gets a working result on straightforward briefs reliably. Where it trails is consistency on harder briefs: testers reported the generated app losing track of earlier decisions more often than the top of the board across a multi step session, and the visual polish of a first render needs more direction in the prompt to get right.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with a daily credit allowance. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for a larger credit balance and private projects.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "Reliable working result on straightforward, well scoped briefs", "Familiar chat to app workflow with no learning curve", "Reasonable pricing relative to the category leaders" ], "weaknesses": [ "Loses track of earlier decisions more often on long sessions", "First render needs more explicit direction than the design leaders", "Smaller template gallery and community than Lovable or Bolt" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full stack React application", "Built in database and authentication", "Conversational iteration", "One click publish and custom domains" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Macaly official site", "url": "https://macaly.com", "date": "2026-08-11" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "How does Macaly compare to Lovable or Bolt?", "a": "Same category and workflow. Voters rate the category leaders higher on consistency across a long session and on first render design quality, which is what keeps Macaly in B tier for now." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-11T09:15:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/macaly.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/macaly.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "rocket-new", "name": "Rocket.new", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rocket-new", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rocket-new/opinions", "official_url": "https://rocket.new", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 712, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1274, "votes_up": 907, "votes_down": 367, "rank": 24, "trend": -16, "h2h_wins": 5, "h2h_losses": 8, "tagline": "Web and mobile from one prompt, Flutter output included.", "summary": "Rocket.new is the clearest pick on the board if you need a mobile app and a web app from the same brief, because Flutter output is a first class target rather than a wrapper. Voters like the breadth and the speed of the initial scaffold. They are less kind about consistency across iterations, where later prompts sometimes undo earlier decisions, and about the depth of the generated backend. It slipped two places this week on reliability votes.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited credits. Paid plans start around 15 EUR per month on a credit model, with higher tiers for teams and published mobile builds.", "price_from_eur": 15, "strengths": [ "Real Flutter output for mobile, not a web wrapper", "One brief covers web and mobile targets", "Fast initial scaffold" ], "weaknesses": [ "Later iterations can undo earlier decisions", "Generated backend is shallow", "Reliability votes trending down this week" ], "features": [ "Web and Flutter mobile generation", "Figma import", "Database and auth scaffolding", "Code export", "Publish to web with custom domain" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Rocket.new official site", "url": "https://rocket.new", "date": "2026-08-13" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can Rocket.new build a real mobile app?", "a": "It generates Flutter projects, so the output is a native build target rather than a website in a shell. Publishing to the app stores is still your job." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-13T10:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/rocket-new.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/rocket-new.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "readdy", "name": "Readdy", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/readdy", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/readdy/opinions", "official_url": "https://readdy.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 706, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 534, "votes_up": 377, "votes_down": 157, "rank": 25, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "AI website and small app builder with a visual editor aimed at freelancers building for clients.", "summary": "Readdy generates multi page sites and simple apps from a prompt with a visual editor for the follow up pass, positioned toward freelancers turning around client sites quickly. Voters in that group like the combination of quick generation and a real editor rather than only re prompting. It scores lower once a brief needs custom backend logic or a real data model, where the platform's simpler foundations show.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single published site. Paid plans start around 25 EUR per month for more projects and client handoff features.", "price_from_eur": 25, "strengths": [ "Quick generation plus a real visual editor for refinement", "Good fit for freelancers turning around client sites", "Straightforward client handoff features" ], "weaknesses": [ "Custom backend logic and real data models are a stretch", "Design ceiling below the leaders for anything ambitious", "Smaller ecosystem of templates and integrations" ], "features": [ "Prompt to multi page site or simple app", "Visual editor for post generation refinement", "Client handoff and white label options", "Basic built in forms and data capture" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Readdy pricing page", "url": "https://readdy.ai/pricing", "date": "2026-08-10" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Who is Readdy built for?", "a": "Freelancers and small agencies turning around client sites quickly. For a data heavy application, voters point elsewhere on the board." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-10T13:40:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/readdy.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/readdy.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "caffeine", "name": "Caffeine", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/caffeine", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/caffeine/opinions", "official_url": "https://caffeine.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 699, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 967, "votes_up": 676, "votes_down": 291, "rank": 26, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "Chat to a full stack app that deploys straight onto the Internet Computer, no separate hosting step.", "summary": "Caffeine, built by DFINITY, generates full stack applications and deploys them directly onto the Internet Computer, which removes a hosting decision entirely and is the reason it earns a real integrations vote despite being newer than most of the board. Voters outside the blockchain ecosystem mark it down for a smaller talent pool of people who can maintain the generated canister based backend, and design output needs a cleanup pass more often than the category leaders.", "pricing_summary": "Free to build and deploy on the Internet Computer's free tier of compute, with paid cycles required as usage scales.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Deployment is built in, no separate hosting decision to make", "Genuinely novel backend model for teams already in that ecosystem", "No cold start once deployed, the network runs it continuously" ], "weaknesses": [ "Smaller pool of developers who can maintain the generated backend", "Design output needs a cleanup pass more often than the leaders", "Ecosystem specific, a harder sell outside teams already using it" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full stack app deployed on chain", "No separate hosting or server configuration", "Continuously running backend, no cold starts", "Built in user authentication via internet identity" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Caffeine official site", "url": "https://caffeine.ai", "date": "2026-08-09" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Do I need to know blockchain development to use Caffeine?", "a": "Not to generate the first version. Maintaining and extending the generated backend by hand is easier if you already understand the Internet Computer's canister model, which is the adoption barrier voters cite most." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-09T16:25:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/caffeine.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/caffeine.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "uizard", "name": "Uizard", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/uizard", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/uizard/opinions", "official_url": "https://uizard.io", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 693, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1203, "votes_up": 834, "votes_down": 369, "rank": 27, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "Sketch, screenshot or prompt to a wireframe, one of the longest running AI UI design tools on the board.", "summary": "Uizard turns a hand drawn sketch, a screenshot of an existing app or a text prompt into an editable wireframe, and it has been doing this longer than most of the board, which shows in how forgiving the input handling is. It is a design and ideation tool rather than a builder: there is no production code export, so voters rate it for speeding up the earliest stage of a project rather than for shipping anything.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a limited number of projects. Paid plans start around 19 EUR per month for unlimited projects and higher resolution exports.", "price_from_eur": 19, "strengths": [ "Forgiving input handling, works from sketches or screenshots", "Mature product with a long track record", "Fast for early stage ideation and stakeholder buy in" ], "weaknesses": [ "No production code export, design only", "Does not complete the board's working application brief", "Output needs a real builder or developer afterward" ], "features": [ "Sketch, screenshot or prompt to wireframe", "Editable design canvas after generation", "Theme and style transfer between screens", "Exportable image and PDF formats" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Uizard pricing page", "url": "https://uizard.io/pricing", "date": "2026-08-10" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can Uizard build a working app on its own?", "a": "No, it produces wireframes and design assets, not a running application. Voters use it before handing the brief to a builder like Base44 or a developer." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-10T10:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/uizard.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/uizard.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "zite", "name": "Zite", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/zite", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/zite/opinions", "official_url": "https://zite.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 688, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1041, "votes_up": 716, "votes_down": 325, "rank": 28, "trend": -19, "h2h_wins": 4, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "Site and light app builder with the friendliest onboarding here.", "summary": "Zite is the gentlest entry point on the board. The onboarding assumes nothing, the editor is legible to someone who has never seen a component tree, and getting a marketing site or a light data driven app live takes minutes. That accessibility is why it climbed a place this week on value and design votes. It is also the ceiling: builders who need custom logic, real relations or an owned codebase run out of room quickly and vote accordingly.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single project. Paid plans start around 12 EUR per month with custom domains, more projects and higher AI limits. It is the cheapest paid entry point on the board.", "price_from_eur": 12, "strengths": [ "Easiest onboarding on the board by a wide margin", "Cheapest paid entry point", "Fast for marketing sites and light data apps", "Climbing on value and design votes" ], "weaknesses": [ "Low ceiling for custom logic", "Data modelling is shallow", "Limited code ownership story" ], "features": [ "Prompt to site and light app generation", "Visual editor with no code concepts", "Forms and simple data collections", "Custom domains", "Template library" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Zite official site", "url": "https://zite.com", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Zite an app builder or a site builder?", "a": "Mostly a site builder with light app capability. On this board it competes on value and accessibility rather than depth." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-12T15:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/zite.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/zite.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "softgen", "name": "Softgen", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/softgen", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/softgen/opinions", "official_url": "https://softgen.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 682, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 456, "votes_up": 311, "votes_down": 145, "rank": 29, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 1, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "A smaller prompt to full stack app builder, straightforward briefs done well, ambitious ones less so.", "summary": "Softgen follows the same chat to full stack app pattern as the category leaders on a smaller team and a smaller community. Straightforward CRUD style briefs come out working and reasonably quickly. Testers reported the agent needing more manual correction on multi step briefs than the top of the board, and the template and integration gallery is noticeably thinner, which is the main thing separating it from the leaders on the reliability and integrations axes.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with limited monthly generations. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for more generations and private projects.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "Handles straightforward CRUD style briefs reliably", "Simple, familiar chat to app workflow", "Accessible pricing for early stage use" ], "weaknesses": [ "More manual correction needed on multi step briefs", "Thinner template and integration gallery than the leaders", "Smaller community, fewer answers to common problems" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full stack web application", "Built in database and basic authentication", "Conversational iteration", "One click deploy" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Softgen official site", "url": "https://softgen.ai", "date": "2026-08-08" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "How does Softgen compare to Lovable or Bolt on a hard brief?", "a": "It handles simple briefs comparably well but needs more manual correction as complexity rises, which is reflected in its lower reliability score against the category leaders." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-08T11:50:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/softgen.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/softgen.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "floot", "name": "Floot", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/floot", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/floot/opinions", "official_url": "https://floot.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 675, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 398, "votes_up": 269, "votes_down": 129, "rank": 30, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 1, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "A newer full stack AI app builder aiming at polished UI and working backend logic together.", "summary": "Floot's pitch is that it treats UI polish and backend logic as one job rather than generating a nice screen with placeholder data behind it. On simple apps that shows in genuinely usable forms and data flows out of the first prompt. It is early: the community is small, the template gallery is thin, and voters report more trial and error getting a multi screen application to hold together than with the established leaders.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for early testing. Paid plans start around 20 EUR per month for more generations and published projects.", "price_from_eur": 20, "strengths": [ "UI polish and working backend logic treated as one job", "Genuinely usable data flows out of a simple first prompt", "Actively developed, features shipping frequently" ], "weaknesses": [ "Small community and thin template gallery given how new it is", "More trial and error on multi screen applications", "Less battle tested than the established leaders" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full stack app with working data flows", "Built in database and forms", "Conversational iteration", "One click publish" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Floot official site", "url": "https://floot.com", "date": "2026-08-07" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Floot mature enough for a real project?", "a": "For a simple app, testers found it usable out of the gate. For anything with several connected screens, expect more iteration than with a more established builder." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-07T15:35:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/floot.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/floot.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "mocha", "name": "Mocha", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mocha", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mocha/opinions", "official_url": "https://getmocha.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 664, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 917, "votes_up": 609, "votes_down": 308, "rank": 31, "trend": -21, "h2h_wins": 3, "h2h_losses": 8, "tagline": "No code framing over a real React and Cloudflare stack.", "summary": "Mocha hides a competent stack behind a no code surface. The generated projects run on React with Cloudflare infrastructure underneath, so the performance floor is higher than the marketing suggests, and the publish flow is genuinely one click. Voters rate the output solid for small products and side projects. The complaints cluster around iteration depth, where later changes get harder rather than easier, and around visibility into what the generator actually did.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with a monthly message allowance. Paid plans start around 14 EUR per month, priced by messages and projects, with hosting included.", "price_from_eur": 14, "strengths": [ "Solid infrastructure underneath a no code surface", "One click publish with hosting included", "Good fit for small products and side projects" ], "weaknesses": [ "Iteration gets harder as the project grows", "Limited visibility into generated structure", "Head to head record is the weakest in B tier" ], "features": [ "Prompt to app generation", "Hosted React and Cloudflare stack", "Auth and database basics", "One click publish", "Custom domains" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Mocha official site", "url": "https://getmocha.com", "date": "2026-08-12" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "What stack does Mocha generate?", "a": "React on the front end with Cloudflare infrastructure behind it, which gives it a better performance floor than most no code surfaces." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-12T09:35:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/mocha.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/mocha.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "durable", "name": "Durable", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/durable", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/durable/opinions", "official_url": "https://durable.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "B", "community_score": 655, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1087, "votes_up": 712, "votes_down": 375, "rank": 32, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "Generates a full small business website, copy and logo included, in about the time it takes to read this.", "summary": "Durable is built for the smallest, fastest case: a service business that needs a site today. One prompt produces pages, written copy and a logo together, and a built in CRM and invoicing layer means some owners never need a second tool. Voters mark it down hard on scope and design ceiling, since it is not attempting a custom application and the visual output is templated rather than distinctive.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier to build and preview. Paid plans start around 12 EUR per month to publish with a custom domain, with a higher tier adding the CRM and invoicing tools.", "price_from_eur": 12, "strengths": [ "Fastest path from nothing to a published small business site", "Copy and logo generated alongside the pages", "Built in CRM and invoicing, genuinely useful for a service business" ], "weaknesses": [ "Design output is templated, not distinctive", "No path to a custom application beyond a small business site", "Limited customisation compared to a real visual editor" ], "features": [ "Prompt to full site with copy and logo", "Built in CRM and invoicing", "Booking and payment collection for service businesses", "One click publish with a custom domain" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Durable pricing page", "url": "https://durable.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-09" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Durable meant for anything beyond a small business website?", "a": "No. It is optimised for the fastest possible small business site with copy, logo and basic business tools included, and it is honest about not attempting a custom application." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-09T09:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/durable.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/durable.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "hostinger-horizons", "name": "Hostinger Horizons", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hostinger-horizons", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hostinger-horizons/opinions", "official_url": "https://hostinger.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 634, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 1342, "votes_up": 851, "votes_down": 491, "rank": 33, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 7, "tagline": "An AI app builder bundled into Hostinger's hosting plans, convenient if you are already a customer.", "summary": "Hostinger Horizons lets existing Hostinger customers generate a simple web app from a prompt without leaving the hosting dashboard they already use, which is the entire value proposition. Generation quality is serviceable for a basic app or landing tool but clearly a bundled feature rather than the product's main focus, and voters comparing it against a dedicated app builder consistently rate the standalone tools higher on every axis except convenience for an existing customer.", "pricing_summary": "Included with qualifying Hostinger hosting plans starting around 9 EUR per month, rather than sold as a standalone product.", "price_from_eur": 9, "strengths": [ "Convenient if you already host with Hostinger", "No separate account or billing relationship needed", "Fine for a basic app or landing page" ], "weaknesses": [ "Clearly a bundled feature, not the product's main focus", "Generation quality trails the dedicated app builders", "Limited value if you are not already a Hostinger customer" ], "features": [ "Prompt to simple web app inside the hosting dashboard", "Bundled with existing Hostinger hosting plans", "Basic database and form support", "One click deploy to Hostinger hosting" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Hostinger Horizons page", "url": "https://hostinger.com", "date": "2026-08-08" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Should I use Horizons if I am not a Hostinger customer?", "a": "Voters say no. It is a convenience feature for existing customers, and a dedicated app builder rates higher on this board for anyone choosing a tool from scratch." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-08T13:15:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/hostinger-horizons.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/hostinger-horizons.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "10web", "name": "10Web", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/10web", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/10web/opinions", "official_url": "https://10web.io", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 627, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 876, "votes_up": 549, "votes_down": 327, "rank": 34, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 1, "h2h_losses": 6, "tagline": "AI website generation that outputs a real, hosted WordPress site rather than a proprietary format.", "summary": "10Web's generator produces a working WordPress site from a prompt, which matters to anyone who wants the world's most common CMS underneath rather than a locked platform. Voters who already know WordPress like being able to drop into the plugin ecosystem afterward. It scores low on this board because a generated WordPress site inherits WordPress's own maintenance and performance overhead, and the AI generation step itself is behind the newer builders on speed and design taste.", "pricing_summary": "Paid plans start around 14 EUR per month including managed WordPress hosting, with higher tiers adding more sites and performance optimisation.", "price_from_eur": 14, "strengths": [ "Outputs a real WordPress site, not a proprietary format", "Access to the full WordPress plugin ecosystem afterward", "Familiar territory for anyone who already manages WordPress" ], "weaknesses": [ "Inherits WordPress's own maintenance and performance overhead", "Generation speed and design taste behind the newer builders", "No meaningful free tier to try before committing" ], "features": [ "Prompt to generated WordPress site", "Managed WordPress hosting included", "AI performance and image optimisation", "Standard WordPress plugin compatibility" ], "sources": [ { "label": "10Web pricing page", "url": "https://10web.io/pricing", "date": "2026-08-07" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why choose 10Web over a purpose built AI app builder?", "a": "Mainly if you specifically want a WordPress site for the plugin ecosystem or existing WordPress skills. For a new project with no WordPress requirement, voters rate the newer builders higher." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-07T10:45:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/10web.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/10web.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "b12", "name": "B12", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/b12", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/b12/opinions", "official_url": "https://b12.io", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 619, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 612, "votes_up": 379, "votes_down": 233, "rank": 35, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 1, "h2h_losses": 5, "tagline": "AI drafts a site for a service business, then a real person reviews it before you see the result.", "summary": "B12 draws a first draft site with AI and then routes it through a human review step before handing it back, aimed at consultants, coaches and other service businesses who want a polished result without doing the work themselves. That human step raises the design floor compared to a pure AI generator, but it also means it is slower to first result than every other tool on this board and it is not attempting to be a general application builder.", "pricing_summary": "Free trial for the first draft. Paid plans start around 29 EUR per month, with pricing reflecting the human review built into the workflow.", "price_from_eur": 29, "strengths": [ "Human review step raises the design floor above a pure AI draft", "Good fit for consultants and service businesses without design skill", "Bookings, contracts and invoicing included for that audience" ], "weaknesses": [ "Slowest time to first result of anything on this board", "Not attempting to be a general purpose application builder", "Ongoing changes route through the same slower review flow" ], "features": [ "AI draft plus human review before delivery", "Built in bookings, contracts and invoicing", "Service business focused templates", "Ongoing support for edits after launch" ], "sources": [ { "label": "B12 pricing page", "url": "https://b12.io/pricing", "date": "2026-08-06" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "How fast is a B12 site ready?", "a": "Slower than a pure AI generator because a human reviews the draft before you see it. Voters trade that speed for a more polished first result." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-06T14:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/b12.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/b12.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "typedream", "name": "Typedream", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/typedream", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/typedream/opinions", "official_url": "https://typedream.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 612, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 471, "votes_up": 288, "votes_down": 183, "rank": 36, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 1, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "A no code, block based site builder with AI content generation, closer to Notion than an app builder.", "summary": "Typedream builds pages from stacked content blocks in a style close to Notion, with an AI layer that drafts copy and page structure on request. It is quick and cheap for a simple marketing site, landing page or personal site. Voters mark it well down on this board's brief because there is no application logic or data model at all, only content pages, which caps its relevance for anything beyond a simple site.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier with a Typedream subdomain. Paid plans start around 9 EUR per month for a custom domain and removing branding.", "price_from_eur": 9, "strengths": [ "Quick and cheap for a simple marketing or personal site", "Familiar block based editing if you already use Notion", "AI assisted copy drafting speeds up the blank page" ], "weaknesses": [ "No application logic or real data model", "Design ceiling is low compared to a dedicated site builder", "Not attempting anything close to the board's application brief" ], "features": [ "Block based page building with AI drafting", "Simple forms for basic data capture", "Custom domain publishing", "SEO basics built in" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Typedream pricing page", "url": "https://typedream.com/pricing", "date": "2026-08-05" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can Typedream build an application?", "a": "No, it builds content pages only. It appears on this board because enough builders compare it for the simplest end of the brief, a personal or marketing site." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-05T11:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/typedream.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/typedream.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "wegic", "name": "Wegic", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wegic", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wegic/opinions", "official_url": "https://wegic.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 605, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 389, "votes_up": 235, "votes_down": 154, "rank": 37, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 4, "tagline": "A chat first website builder that keeps editing the same site through further conversation.", "summary": "Wegic builds and then continues editing a website entirely through chat, rather than handing you a visual canvas once the first draft lands. That keeps the workflow simple for someone who does not want to learn an editor, and testers found it fine for a basic multi page site. It has no real application layer and the conversational only editing became a limitation once changes got specific, since some layout adjustments are easier to describe than to get right through text alone.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a limited site. Paid plans start around 12 EUR per month for a custom domain and more pages.", "price_from_eur": 12, "strengths": [ "Simple chat only workflow with no editor to learn", "Fine for a basic multi page marketing site", "Continuous editing through further conversation" ], "weaknesses": [ "No visual canvas, some changes are hard to describe accurately in text", "No real application layer or data model", "Smaller community than the established site builders" ], "features": [ "Chat to multi page website", "Ongoing edits through conversation", "Basic contact forms", "One click publish with a custom domain" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Wegic official site", "url": "https://wegic.ai", "date": "2026-08-04" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Does Wegic have a visual editor?", "a": "No, all editing happens through chat. Voters who want direct visual control point to Framer or Webflow instead." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-04T09:30:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/wegic.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/wegic.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "hocoos", "name": "Hocoos", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hocoos", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hocoos/opinions", "official_url": "https://hocoos.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 598, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 327, "votes_up": 196, "votes_down": 131, "rank": 38, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "AI website builder for small businesses with a logo and brand kit generated alongside the site.", "summary": "Hocoos targets the same small business first site as Durable, generating pages, a logo and a basic brand kit from a short questionnaire. Testers found it fine for a straightforward business site with none of the ambition of an application build. It scores at the lower end of this board because the design output is generic without manual polish and there is no meaningful path from here to a custom application.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier to build and preview. Paid plans start around 8 EUR per month to publish with a custom domain.", "price_from_eur": 8, "strengths": [ "Logo and brand kit generated alongside the site", "Cheap entry price for a straightforward business site", "Quick questionnaire based setup" ], "weaknesses": [ "Design output is generic without manual polish", "No path from here to a custom application", "Smaller ecosystem than the established small business builders" ], "features": [ "Prompt or questionnaire to small business site", "Logo and brand kit generation", "Basic booking and contact forms", "One click publish with a custom domain" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Hocoos pricing page", "url": "https://hocoos.com", "date": "2026-08-03" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "How is Hocoos different from Durable?", "a": "Both target a fast small business site with a generated brand kit. Voters rate Durable's built in CRM and invoicing tools as the more complete package for a service business." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-03T15:15:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/hocoos.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/hocoos.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "mixo", "name": "Mixo", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mixo", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mixo/opinions", "official_url": "https://mixo.io", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 591, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 415, "votes_up": 245, "votes_down": 170, "rank": 39, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "One of the earliest AI landing page generators, still quick for a single startup launch page.", "summary": "Mixo was one of the first tools to generate a startup landing page from a one line prompt, and that narrow job is still what it does. A name and a short description produce a page with copy, a waitlist form and basic sections ready to publish. It has no application layer at all and voters treat it purely as a launch page tool rather than anything competing with the app builders on this board's brief.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier to build and preview. Paid plans start around 10 EUR per month for a custom domain and waitlist export.", "price_from_eur": 10, "strengths": [ "Very quick for a single startup landing page", "Waitlist collection built in from the start", "Cheap entry price" ], "weaknesses": [ "No application layer or data model beyond a waitlist", "Design templates feel dated next to the newer builders", "Not attempting anything beyond a single launch page" ], "features": [ "Prompt to landing page with copy", "Built in waitlist collection", "Basic analytics on page visits", "One click publish with a custom domain" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Mixo official site", "url": "https://mixo.io", "date": "2026-08-02" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Mixo still relevant next to newer AI builders?", "a": "For a one page launch with a waitlist, yes, it still does that job quickly. For anything with a real data model, voters point to almost anything else on this board." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-02T13:40:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/mixo.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/mixo.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "trickle", "name": "Trickle", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/trickle", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/trickle/opinions", "official_url": "https://trickle.so", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 588, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 623, "votes_up": 366, "votes_down": 257, "rank": 40, "trend": -29, "h2h_wins": 2, "h2h_losses": 9, "tagline": "Pages, forms and small workflows, cheap and quick.", "summary": "Trickle is scoped deliberately small and the board scores it accordingly. Landing pages, forms and light workflows come out quickly and cheaply, and for that narrow job the votes are positive. Asked to behave like a full application builder it falls over, which is why it anchors C tier rather than competing in B. It is on the board because a lot of people genuinely start here, and because a scoreboard that only lists winners is not a scoreboard.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for basic pages. Paid plans start around 10 EUR per month, the lowest paid entry on the board, with limits on projects and AI generations.", "price_from_eur": 10, "strengths": [ "Cheapest option on the board", "Very fast for pages, forms and small workflows", "Almost no learning curve" ], "weaknesses": [ "Not a real application builder", "No meaningful data modelling", "Weakest head to head record on the board" ], "features": [ "AI page and form generation", "Simple workflow automations", "Template gallery", "Custom domain on paid plans" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Trickle official site", "url": "https://trickle.so", "date": "2026-08-11" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why is Trickle in C tier?", "a": "C tier is not a failing grade, it is a scope statement. Trickle does pages, forms and small workflows well and does not attempt the application work that S and A tier entries are voted on." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-11T12:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/trickle.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/trickle.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "onlook", "name": "Onlook", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/onlook", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/onlook/opinions", "official_url": "https://onlook.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 581, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 342, "votes_up": 199, "votes_down": 143, "rank": 41, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "An open source visual editor that lets you drag and edit an existing React app's live code.", "summary": "Onlook is not a generator, it is a visual editor for a codebase you already have: point it at a React project and you can move, restyle and rewire real components on a live canvas instead of hand editing files. Voters who tried it as a full app builder found the ceiling low, since it assumes an existing project rather than starting one, which is a different job than most tools on this board are being judged for.", "pricing_summary": "Free and open source to self host. A hosted version is in early access with usage based pricing still settling.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Visual editing of a live, real React codebase", "Open source, no lock in to a hosted platform", "Useful alongside a builder rather than instead of one" ], "weaknesses": [ "Assumes an existing project, does not start one from a prompt", "Early stage, rougher edges than a mature product", "Not a fit for anyone wanting a full build from nothing" ], "features": [ "Visual canvas editing of live React components", "Open source and self hostable", "Works alongside an existing codebase", "Direct code changes from visual edits" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Onlook GitHub repository", "url": "https://onlook.com", "date": "2026-08-01" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Can Onlook build an app from a prompt like the other tools here?", "a": "No, it edits an existing React codebase visually rather than generating a new one. Voters use it after a build from another tool, not instead of one." } ], "last_verified": "2026-08-01T10:20:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/onlook.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/onlook.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "visily", "name": "Visily", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/visily", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/visily/opinions", "official_url": "https://visily.ai", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 574, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 298, "votes_up": 171, "votes_down": 127, "rank": 42, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 2, "tagline": "Screenshot or prompt to wireframe, aimed at product teams sketching ideas before a real build starts.", "summary": "Visily takes a screenshot of an app you like or a short prompt and produces an editable wireframe, used mostly by product teams to sketch an idea quickly before committing to a real build. It has no code output and no working application behind the wireframes, which is why it sits at the lower end of a board scored on shipping a working product rather than a design step.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a limited number of projects. Paid plans start around 15 EUR per month for unlimited projects and team collaboration.", "price_from_eur": 15, "strengths": [ "Fast from a screenshot or prompt to an editable wireframe", "Useful for product teams sketching ideas before a build", "Simple enough for non designers to use directly" ], "weaknesses": [ "No code output, design only", "No working application behind the wireframes", "Does not attempt the board's working application brief" ], "features": [ "Screenshot or prompt to wireframe", "Editable design canvas", "Team collaboration on shared boards", "Exportable design assets" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Visily pricing page", "url": "https://visily.ai/pricing", "date": "2026-07-31" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Should I use Visily instead of an app builder?", "a": "No, it is a design ideation step. Voters use it to sketch an idea, then hand the result to a builder or a developer to actually ship." } ], "last_verified": "2026-07-31T14:10:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/visily.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/visily.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "catdoes", "name": "CatDoes", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/catdoes", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/catdoes/opinions", "official_url": "https://catdoes.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 561, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 187, "votes_up": 105, "votes_down": 82, "rank": 43, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 2, "tagline": "A small, newer AI site and micro app builder with a narrow but growing following.", "summary": "CatDoes is one of the smaller entries on this board, a prompt driven builder for simple sites and micro apps with a following that is real but narrow. Testers got a working basic result quickly on a small brief. It has the smallest template gallery and community of any tool tracked here, and voters could not get a multi step brief past the first draft without heavy manual cleanup.", "pricing_summary": "Free tier for a single project. Paid plans start around 10 EUR per month for more projects and a custom domain.", "price_from_eur": 10, "strengths": [ "Quick working result on a small, simple brief", "Growing community despite its size", "Cheap entry price" ], "weaknesses": [ "Smallest template gallery and community on the board", "Multi step briefs need heavy manual cleanup", "Limited track record compared to established tools" ], "features": [ "Prompt to simple site or micro app", "Basic data storage for small projects", "One click publish", "Community template sharing" ], "sources": [ { "label": "CatDoes official site", "url": "https://catdoes.com", "date": "2026-07-30" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is CatDoes ready for a serious project?", "a": "For a small, simple brief, testers got a usable first result. For anything bigger, expect to do more of the work manually than with an established builder." } ], "last_verified": "2026-07-30T11:25:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/catdoes.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/catdoes.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "youware", "name": "YouWare", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/youware", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/youware/opinions", "official_url": "https://youware.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 548, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 156, "votes_up": 85, "votes_down": 71, "rank": 44, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 2, "tagline": "A community platform for AI generated mini apps, games and sites, built for sharing rather than shipping.", "summary": "YouWare is closer to a community gallery than a product builder: prompts generate small interactive sites, games and mini apps that are then shared and remixed by other users on the platform. It is genuinely fun for quick, disposable creations, and voters treat it that way. It scores at the bottom of this board because it is not aimed at producing a serious, standalone application, and there is no real path to owning and deploying the result independently.", "pricing_summary": "Free to use, with the platform monetised around community and remixing rather than a subscription for individual creators.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Fun, fast way to generate small interactive creations", "Community remixing makes iteration social rather than solitary", "No cost barrier to trying it" ], "weaknesses": [ "Not aimed at a serious, standalone application", "No real path to owning and deploying the result independently", "Lowest scoring reliability and integrations on the board" ], "features": [ "Prompt to shareable mini app, game or site", "Community remixing of published creations", "Built in gallery and discovery feed", "No account needed to browse" ], "sources": [ { "label": "YouWare official site", "url": "https://youware.com", "date": "2026-07-29" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Why does YouWare sit at the bottom of the board?", "a": "It is built for sharing quick, disposable creations within a community, not for shipping and owning a serious application, which is what this board's weights reward." } ], "last_verified": "2026-07-29T09:45:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/youware.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/youware.png", "opinion_count": 2 }, { "slug": "google-stitch", "name": "Google Stitch", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/google-stitch", "opinions_url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/google-stitch/opinions", "official_url": "https://stitch.withgoogle.com", "category": "app_builder", "tier": "C", "community_score": 536, "community_score_max": 1000, "votes_total": 703, "votes_up": 377, "votes_down": 326, "rank": 45, "trend": 0, "h2h_wins": 0, "h2h_losses": 3, "tagline": "A Google Labs experiment that sketches UI designs and frontend code from a prompt, still clearly a beta.", "summary": "Google Stitch generates UI designs and basic frontend code from a text prompt or a rough sketch, and it carries the label a lot of early Labs experiments do: interesting direction, rough execution. Testers found the generated designs a reasonable starting point for ideation, but the exported code needed substantial rework before it resembled anything production ready, which is what keeps it at the bottom of the board on reliability and code quality.", "pricing_summary": "Free to use as a Google Labs experiment, with no committed pricing plan since it has not left beta.", "price_from_eur": 0, "strengths": [ "Free to try, backed by Google's design and model research", "Reasonable starting point for early UI ideation", "Accepts a rough sketch as well as a text prompt" ], "weaknesses": [ "Exported code needs substantial rework before production use", "Still clearly a beta, features change without notice", "No committed pricing or roadmap since it has not left Labs" ], "features": [ "Prompt or sketch to UI design", "Basic frontend code export", "Experimental Google Labs feature set", "Iteration through further prompts" ], "sources": [ { "label": "Google Stitch by Labs", "url": "https://stitch.withgoogle.com", "date": "2026-07-28" } ], "faq": [ { "q": "Is Google Stitch ready for production use?", "a": "Not yet, by Google's own framing. Testers treat it as an ideation tool and expect to substantially rework any exported code before shipping it." } ], "last_verified": "2026-07-28T16:00:00.000Z", "logo": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/logos/google-stitch.png", "screenshot": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/screenshots/google-stitch.png", "opinion_count": 2 } ], "duels": [ { "slug": "lovable-vs-totalum", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/lovable/totalum", "tool_a": "lovable", "tool_b": "totalum", "votes_a": 1834, "votes_b": 1607, "winner": "lovable", "published_at": "2026-08-18T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "lovable-vs-bolt-new", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/lovable/bolt-new", "tool_a": "lovable", "tool_b": "bolt-new", "votes_a": 1962, "votes_b": 1743, "winner": "lovable", "published_at": "2026-08-18T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "claude-code-vs-cursor", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/claude-code/cursor", "tool_a": "claude-code", "tool_b": "cursor", "votes_a": 1739, "votes_b": 1592, "winner": "claude-code", "published_at": "2026-08-18T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "framer-vs-webflow", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/framer/webflow", "tool_a": "framer", "tool_b": "webflow", "votes_a": 967, "votes_b": 842, "winner": "framer", "published_at": "2026-08-17T09:30:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "totalum-vs-base44", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/totalum/base44", "tool_a": "totalum", "tool_b": "base44", "votes_a": 1421, "votes_b": 903, "winner": "totalum", "published_at": "2026-08-17T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "bolt-new-vs-v0", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/bolt-new/v0", "tool_a": "bolt-new", "tool_b": "v0", "votes_a": 1288, "votes_b": 1176, "winner": "bolt-new", "published_at": "2026-08-16T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "rork-vs-a0-dev", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/rork/a0-dev", "tool_a": "rork", "tool_b": "a0-dev", "votes_a": 512, "votes_b": 447, "winner": "rork", "published_at": "2026-08-15T09:20:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "replit-vs-emergent", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/replit/emergent", "tool_a": "replit", "tool_b": "emergent", "votes_a": 1104, "votes_b": 812, "winner": "replit", "published_at": "2026-08-15T09:00:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "manus-vs-emergent", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/manus/emergent", "tool_a": "manus", "tool_b": "emergent", "votes_a": 731, "votes_b": 689, "winner": "manus", "published_at": "2026-08-14T09:10:00.000Z" }, { "slug": "durable-vs-hocoos", "url": "https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/durable/hocoos", "tool_a": "durable", "tool_b": "hocoos", "votes_a": 398, "votes_b": 271, "winner": "durable", "published_at": "2026-08-11T09:05:00.000Z" } ], "movers": [ { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "v0", "from_rank": 4, "to_rank": 5, "delta": -1, "reason": "Did not lose a vote. We expanded the app builder board this week from 11 to 45 tracked tools by community request, and Framer's design led site generator slotted straight in at 4th on design and speed votes, one place above where v0 already sat. Code quality votes still lead the board." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "replit", "from_rank": 5, "to_rank": 8, "delta": -3, "reason": "Passed by two new entrants rather than by a falling score: Firebase Studio and Webflow both joined this week's expanded board with community and integrations votes strong enough to slot in ahead of it. Replit's own numbers did not move." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "base44", "from_rank": 6, "to_rank": 11, "delta": -5, "reason": "Two of this week's 34 new entrants, Figma Make and Wix, scored high enough on design and value votes to land ahead of it. Base44 is still the top of the batteries included cluster, it just has new company at the top of A tier now that the board tracks more of the field." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "emergent", "from_rank": 7, "to_rank": 14, "delta": -7, "reason": "Magic Patterns and Manus both entered this week ahead of it on the newly expanded board, Manus specifically on agent performance votes for the same kind of long horizon autonomy Emergent is rated on. A crowded week for A tier, not a falling score." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "rocket-new", "from_rank": 8, "to_rank": 24, "delta": -16, "reason": "The board added nine new tools this week that scored between Emergent and Rocket.new on the combined weights, Subframe and Genspark chief among them. Reliability votes on later iterations undoing earlier decisions are still the thing to watch here, expansion or not." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "zite", "from_rank": 9, "to_rank": 28, "delta": -19, "reason": "Three new entrants, Readdy, Caffeine and Uizard, scored ahead of it once the board expanded to 45 tracked tools this week. Zite's value and onboarding votes are unchanged, there is simply more of the field visible now." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "mocha", "from_rank": 10, "to_rank": 31, "delta": -21, "reason": "Softgen and Floot both joined this week's expanded board just ahead of it. Mocha's own reliability votes are still soft, iteration getting harder as a project grows is the recurring complaint, and that is now more visible with more comparable tools sitting right next to it." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "trickle", "from_rank": 11, "to_rank": 40, "delta": -29, "reason": "The single biggest rank move this week, though not because anything changed about Trickle. Eight of the 34 newly tracked tools, from Durable down to Mixo, scored above it once the board expanded past the original 11 app builders. It still anchors the bottom of C tier on scope rather than on execution." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "claude-code", "from_rank": 2, "to_rank": 1, "delta": 1, "reason": "Took the coding agent board on agent performance votes. Long task retention is the axis voters keep citing, and the MCP tooling story widened the gap." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "cursor", "from_rank": 1, "to_rank": 2, "delta": -1, "reason": "Lost the category lead by 147 votes. Editing experience votes are still the best in the category, but context management complaints on large repositories moved reliability against it." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "codex-cli", "from_rank": 5, "to_rank": 3, "delta": 2, "reason": "Up two on reliability votes. Sandboxed execution and a diff to review before anything lands is exactly what the reliability axis rewards, and parallel task runs picked up agent performance votes on top." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "github-copilot", "from_rank": 3, "to_rank": 4, "delta": -1, "reason": "Down one without losing a vote. Nothing went wrong here: the seats, the review workflows and the approval story are all intact, and it still carries more votes than anything else in its band. It simply got passed on raw agent quality by a tool voters rate higher on the axes that carry weight." }, { "week_iso": "2026-W34", "tool_slug": "windsurf", "from_rank": 4, "to_rank": 5, "delta": -1, "reason": "Down one on trust. Model availability changing for existing users came up in a third of its vote comments this week, which outweighed a very strong free tier." } ] } }