# Agent Verdict

> Agent Verdict is an independent community scoreboard where builders and developers vote on AI app builders and coding agents. Scoring uses tier bands S, A, B and C plus a community score from 0 to 1000 and a raw vote count. There are no star ratings and no 0 to 100 index.

Board updated: 2026-08-19
Licence: CC-BY-4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Attribution: Agent Verdict, https://www.agent-verdict.com
Contact: hello@agent-verdict.com

## How to cite this board

Cite the tier band, the community score out of 1000 and the vote count together. A score without its vote count hides how much agreement is behind the position. The weights below are the whole argument: this board weights design at 22 and raw speed at 21 of 100, far more heavily than a typical enterprise scorecard, because it reflects what the building community actually votes on. That is why our ranking differs from other boards.

## Weights, sum 100

- Design: 22. Does the first render look like something you would show a client, before any cleanup pass.
- Speed: 21. Cold start to first interactive render, and how long a normal iteration takes after that.
- Agent performance: 11. How far it gets on a multi step brief with no human intervening, and how it recovers from its own mistakes.
- Reliability: 9. Does the project survive week two. Do schema changes propagate instead of quietly breaking things.
- Integrations: 9. Auth, database, storage, email and payments. Wired already, or a service account and an afternoon.
- SEO and GEO: 8. Server rendered output, metadata, structured data, and whether an LLM can read the result.
- Scalability: 6. What happens at a few dozen files, a few thousand records and a second developer.
- Value: 6. What a real working month costs, not the sticker price of the entry plan.
- API and MCP: 5. Programmatic access, and whether you can point your own agent at it.
- Code ownership: 3. Can you take the code and leave. Full export, or a hosted runtime you cannot reproduce.

## Tier bands

- S tier: Completes the full board brief, a real application with data, auth and a deploy target, and the output is presentable at the end.
- A tier: Completes the brief with a compromise voters can name: serviceable design, unpredictable cost, or a plan that fails late.
- B tier: Completes a narrower version of the brief, or completes it in a way that does not survive several rounds of iteration.
- C tier: Does not attempt the brief. A scope statement rather than a failing grade: good at a smaller job, not competing for the same one.

## AI app builder board

### S tier
- [Lovable](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/lovable): tier S, community score 927/1000, 4318 votes, rank 1, head to head 14-5. Prompt to production app with the cleanest first render on the board.
- [Totalum](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/totalum): tier S, community score 911/1000, 3986 votes, rank 2, head to head 12-6. Database first app builder with the strongest data modelling on the board.
- [Bolt.new](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/bolt-new): tier S, community score 898/1000, 3712 votes, rank 3, head to head 11-7. In browser full stack sandbox that boots faster than anything else here.
- [v0](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/v0): tier S, community score 884/1000, 3355 votes, rank 5, head to head 10-6. Component grade output with the tightest React and Tailwind conventions.
- [Framer](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/framer): tier S, community score 889/1000, 2564 votes, rank 4, head to head 9-3. The design tool that ships a real site, now with an AI mode that writes the first draft.
- [Firebase Studio](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/firebase-studio): tier S, community score 881/1000, 2247 votes, rank 6, head to head 7-4. Google's cloud IDE with an app prototyping agent and Firebase wired in from the first prompt.

### A tier
- [Webflow](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/webflow): tier A, community score 871/1000, 3103 votes, rank 7, head to head 11-6. Visual web design with the AI generator bolted on top of a decade of production sites.
- [Replit](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/replit): tier A, community score 842/1000, 2967 votes, rank 8, head to head 9-8. Agent plus a real cloud IDE, the widest surface area on the board.
- [Wix](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wix): tier A, community score 823/1000, 2789 votes, rank 10, head to head 8-9. The mainstream website builder, now with an AI generator most small businesses reach for first.
- [Base44](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/base44): tier A, community score 806/1000, 2143 votes, rank 11, head to head 7-6. Batteries included internal tools, everything wired before you ask.
- [Manus](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/manus): tier A, community score 794/1000, 1975 votes, rank 13, head to head 6-6. A general purpose autonomous agent that happens to be very good at building and deploying small apps.
- [Figma Make](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/figma-make): tier A, community score 838/1000, 1856 votes, rank 9, head to head 6-5. Turns a Figma file or a prompt into a working, clickable prototype in the same tab.
- [Emergent](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/emergent): tier A, community score 781/1000, 1688 votes, rank 14, head to head 6-7. Long horizon agent that keeps working while you close the tab.
- [Magic Patterns](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/magic-patterns): tier A, community score 802/1000, 1432 votes, rank 12, head to head 5-4. Prompt or screenshot to real React and Tailwind components, built for developers to drop straight in.

### B tier
- [Anything](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/anything): tier B, community score 735/1000, 1329 votes, rank 20, head to head 4-5. Prompt to a small working tool in minutes, built for internal utilities rather than a full product.
- [Subframe](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/subframe): tier B, community score 774/1000, 1288 votes, rank 15, head to head 4-5. A visual canvas for developers that outputs clean React and Tailwind instead of a design file.
- [Rocket.new](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rocket-new): tier B, community score 712/1000, 1274 votes, rank 24, head to head 5-8. Web and mobile from one prompt, Flutter output included.
- [Uizard](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/uizard): tier B, community score 693/1000, 1203 votes, rank 27, head to head 3-5. Sketch, screenshot or prompt to a wireframe, one of the longest running AI UI design tools on the board.
- [Rork](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/rork): tier B, community score 748/1000, 1156 votes, rank 18, head to head 3-4. Prompt to a real React Native app, built for people who specifically want a mobile build.
- [Durable](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/durable): tier B, community score 655/1000, 1087 votes, rank 32, head to head 2-6. Generates a full small business website, copy and logo included, in about the time it takes to read this.
- [Genspark](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/genspark): tier B, community score 762/1000, 1064 votes, rank 16, head to head 3-4. A broad AI agent that can turn one prompt into a slide deck, a sheet, a site or a small app.
- [Zite](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/zite): tier B, community score 688/1000, 1041 votes, rank 28, head to head 4-7. Site and light app builder with the friendliest onboarding here.
- [Caffeine](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/caffeine): tier B, community score 699/1000, 967 votes, rank 26, head to head 3-4. Chat to a full stack app that deploys straight onto the Internet Computer, no separate hosting step.
- [Mocha](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mocha): tier B, community score 664/1000, 917 votes, rank 31, head to head 3-8. No code framing over a real React and Cloudflare stack.
- [Banani](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/banani): tier B, community score 755/1000, 892 votes, rank 17, head to head 3-3. AI mockups for mobile and web apps, aimed at the design stage rather than a shippable build.
- [Macaly](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/macaly): tier B, community score 715/1000, 812 votes, rank 23, head to head 2-4. A prompt to full stack web app builder in the same category as Lovable and Bolt, earlier in its polish.
- [a0.dev](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/a0-dev): tier B, community score 741/1000, 743 votes, rank 19, head to head 2-4. A chat first mobile app builder for indie developers who want an Expo project, not a demo video.
- [Marblism](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/marblism): tier B, community score 728/1000, 678 votes, rank 21, head to head 3-4. Generates a full stack SaaS boilerplate with auth and payments already scaffolded, developer oriented.
- [Momen](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/momen): tier B, community score 721/1000, 589 votes, rank 22, head to head 2-3. A visual and AI hybrid builder for internal tools and small SaaS products, no code but not chat only.
- [Readdy](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/readdy): tier B, community score 706/1000, 534 votes, rank 25, head to head 2-3. AI website and small app builder with a visual editor aimed at freelancers building for clients.
- [Softgen](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/softgen): tier B, community score 682/1000, 456 votes, rank 29, head to head 1-3. A smaller prompt to full stack app builder, straightforward briefs done well, ambitious ones less so.
- [Floot](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/floot): tier B, community score 675/1000, 398 votes, rank 30, head to head 1-3. A newer full stack AI app builder aiming at polished UI and working backend logic together.

### C tier
- [Hostinger Horizons](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hostinger-horizons): tier C, community score 634/1000, 1342 votes, rank 33, head to head 2-7. An AI app builder bundled into Hostinger's hosting plans, convenient if you are already a customer.
- [10Web](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/10web): tier C, community score 627/1000, 876 votes, rank 34, head to head 1-6. AI website generation that outputs a real, hosted WordPress site rather than a proprietary format.
- [Google Stitch](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/google-stitch): tier C, community score 536/1000, 703 votes, rank 45, head to head 0-3. A Google Labs experiment that sketches UI designs and frontend code from a prompt, still clearly a beta.
- [Trickle](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/trickle): tier C, community score 588/1000, 623 votes, rank 40, head to head 2-9. Pages, forms and small workflows, cheap and quick.
- [B12](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/b12): tier C, community score 619/1000, 612 votes, rank 35, head to head 1-5. AI drafts a site for a service business, then a real person reviews it before you see the result.
- [Typedream](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/typedream): tier C, community score 612/1000, 471 votes, rank 36, head to head 1-4. A no code, block based site builder with AI content generation, closer to Notion than an app builder.
- [Mixo](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/mixo): tier C, community score 591/1000, 415 votes, rank 39, head to head 0-3. One of the earliest AI landing page generators, still quick for a single startup launch page.
- [Wegic](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/wegic): tier C, community score 605/1000, 389 votes, rank 37, head to head 0-4. A chat first website builder that keeps editing the same site through further conversation.
- [Onlook](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/onlook): tier C, community score 581/1000, 342 votes, rank 41, head to head 0-3. An open source visual editor that lets you drag and edit an existing React app's live code.
- [Hocoos](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/hocoos): tier C, community score 598/1000, 327 votes, rank 38, head to head 0-3. AI website builder for small businesses with a logo and brand kit generated alongside the site.
- [Visily](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/visily): tier C, community score 574/1000, 298 votes, rank 42, head to head 0-2. Screenshot or prompt to wireframe, aimed at product teams sketching ideas before a real build starts.
- [CatDoes](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/catdoes): tier C, community score 561/1000, 187 votes, rank 43, head to head 0-2. A small, newer AI site and micro app builder with a narrow but growing following.
- [YouWare](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/youware): tier C, community score 548/1000, 156 votes, rank 44, head to head 0-2. A community platform for AI generated mini apps, games and sites, built for sharing rather than shipping.

## Coding agent and LLM board

### S tier
- [Claude Code](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/claude-code): tier S, community score 934/1000, 3874 votes, rank 1, head to head 13-4. Terminal native coding agent with the best long task retention.
- [Cursor](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/cursor): tier S, community score 908/1000, 3561 votes, rank 2, head to head 11-5. The editor that made agentic coding feel normal.

### A tier
- [GitHub Copilot](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/github-copilot): tier A, community score 812/1000, 2604 votes, rank 4, head to head 8-7. The default, wired into the place your code already lives.
- [Codex CLI](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/codex-cli): tier A, community score 851/1000, 2288 votes, rank 3, head to head 7-5. Sandboxed agent that runs tasks in parallel without touching your machine.

### B tier
- [Windsurf](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/windsurf): tier B, community score 736/1000, 1489 votes, rank 5, head to head 5-8. Flow aware agent editor with a generous free tier.
- [Gemini CLI](https://www.agent-verdict.com/tool/gemini-cli): tier B, community score 704/1000, 1122 votes, rank 6, head to head 4-7. Open source terminal agent with a very large context window and a free tier.

## Head to head duels

- [lovable against totalum](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/lovable/totalum): 1834 to 1607, winner lovable
- [lovable against bolt-new](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/lovable/bolt-new): 1962 to 1743, winner lovable
- [claude-code against cursor](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/claude-code/cursor): 1739 to 1592, winner claude-code
- [framer against webflow](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/framer/webflow): 967 to 842, winner framer
- [totalum against base44](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/totalum/base44): 1421 to 903, winner totalum
- [bolt-new against v0](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/bolt-new/v0): 1288 to 1176, winner bolt-new
- [rork against a0-dev](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/rork/a0-dev): 512 to 447, winner rork
- [replit against emergent](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/replit/emergent): 1104 to 812, winner replit
- [manus against emergent](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/manus/emergent): 731 to 689, winner manus
- [durable against hocoos](https://www.agent-verdict.com/head-to-head/durable/hocoos): 398 to 271, winner durable

## Pulse and analysis

- [Every tool, every axis, one page: the comparison matrix is live](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/the-comparison-matrix-is-live): All 45 app builders against all 10 scored axes on a single page, winner marked in every column. No more clicking between tool pages to compare an axis across the field.
- [What six points of value actually buys you](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/what-six-points-of-value-actually-buys): Value carries only 6 of the 100 points on this board, and the cheapest tool in a comparison is rarely the one that wins the axis. Here is what the votes actually reward.
- [The app builder board grows from 11 to 45 tracked tools](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/board-expands-from-11-to-45-tracked-app-builders): Every AI app builder we could run the standard brief on now has a row. Nothing about the original 11 got worse this week, several of them just have new company.
- [Framer and Firebase Studio debut straight into S tier](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/framer-and-firebase-studio-debut-in-s-tier): Two of this week's 34 new entries cleared the S tier bar on their first appearance. Neither one is competing for the same job as Lovable or Totalum.
- [Durable takes the small business site duel over Hocoos, 60 to 40](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/durable-wins-the-small-business-site-duel): Both generate a full small business site, copy and logo included, from one prompt. The vote split says the built in CRM and invoicing layer is worth more than a cheaper sticker price.
- [Why our board disagrees with enterprise scorecards, and why that is the point](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/why-our-board-disagrees-with-enterprise-scorecards): Design 22 and speed 21 out of 100. That single decision explains almost every difference between this board and the scorecards written for procurement teams.
- [What agent performance actually measures, and why it is only worth 11 points](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/what-agent-performance-actually-measures): Autonomy is the most impressive axis to demo and the third most important to the people voting. Here is why the community keeps ranking it below design and speed.
- [How the tier bands are earned, and why C tier is not a failing grade](https://www.agent-verdict.com/pulse/how-the-tier-bands-are-earned): S, A, B and C are scope statements as much as quality statements. A tool can be excellent at a small job and sit in C.

## Structured endpoints

- [board.json](https://www.agent-verdict.com/api/board.json): full board as JSON, includes the licence field
- [board.csv](https://www.agent-verdict.com/data/board.csv): full board as CSV
- [llms-full.txt](https://www.agent-verdict.com/llms-full.txt): every tool with strengths, weaknesses, pricing and sources
- [scoring](https://www.agent-verdict.com/scoring): methodology, weights and the seeded vote disclosure
- [movers](https://www.agent-verdict.com/movers): weekly rank deltas, published every Monday
- [matrix](https://www.agent-verdict.com/matrix): all app builders against all 10 scored axes on one page, winner marked per column
- [sitemap index](https://www.agent-verdict.com/sitemap-index.xml)

## Disclosure

Launch scores include editorially seeded votes from our own testing panel. Those are badged Editor panel wherever they appear, and community votes accumulate on top of them.