Every published opinion on CatDoes, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 43 on the ai app builders board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
561 / 1000
Community score
2.81
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
553 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 30 Jul 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Toby Ellison
@tellisonEditor panel29 Jul 2026Hobbyist builder.
Found it through a small community that has grown around it and it did exactly what I needed for a weekend project. I would not describe the ecosystem around it as mature yet, there just are not many other people to compare notes with.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel26 Jul 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
One of the smaller entries here, a working basic result on a small simple brief came together quickly. The smallest template gallery and community of anything we tracked, and a multi step brief did not survive past the first draft without heavy manual cleanup on our end.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by CatDoes.
561 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 187 votes, which maps to 2.81 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is C.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
