Every published opinion on Claude Code, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 1 on the coding agents and llms board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
934 / 1000
Community score
4.67
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
928 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 18 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel13 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Given a two hour refactor across forty files it was the only agent that still knew what it had decided in the first ten minutes. MCP is the other differentiator: wiring it into our own internal tooling took an afternoon. It assumes a terminal and an existing repository, so it is not competing with the app builders.
Yusuf Kaya
@yusufkEditor panel16 Aug 2026Staff engineer on a large monorepo.
It reads the codebase before it writes, which sounds obvious and is apparently hard. Conventions get respected without me pasting a style guide into every prompt. Rate limits on the entry plan are the only thing that has annoyed me.
Elena Petrova
17 Aug 2026
Rate limits are the one thing that makes me keep Cursor open as a backup on a heavy week.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Claude Code.
934 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 3,874 votes, which maps to 4.67 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is S.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
