Every published opinion on Codex CLI, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 3 on the coding agents and llms board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
851 / 1000
Community score
4.26
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
848 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 17 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel14 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Sandboxing plus a diff to review before anything lands is the most conservative execution model in the category, and it shows in the reliability votes. Fanning six mechanical tasks out in parallel is a genuine advantage. Telling the sandbox about our environment took real setup time.
Ana Sousa
@anasousaEditor panel17 Aug 2026Developer on a large Python codebase.
Nothing touches my working tree until I say so, which is exactly what I want from an agent. Parallel runs turned a two day migration into an afternoon of reviewing diffs.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Codex CLI.
851 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 2,288 votes, which maps to 4.26 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is A.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
