Every published opinion on Figma Make, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 9 on the ai app builders board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
838 / 1000
Community score
4.19
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
838 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 16 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel12 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Point it at an existing Figma file and it respects components and variables better than any prompt to code tool we tested, which is a genuinely different job than starting from nothing. Ask it to become a real shipped application with a persistent database and it runs out of road fast, exactly as its own weaknesses list suggests.
Rosa Delgado
@rosadEditor panel15 Aug 2026Product designer.
We use it to compress design review from days to an afternoon: file goes in, clickable prototype comes out, stakeholders click through in the same meeting. It has never once been how we ship the real thing, that handoff always goes to a developer or another builder further up this board.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Figma Make.
838 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 1,856 votes, which maps to 4.19 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is A.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
