Every published opinion on Macaly, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 23 on the ai app builders board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
715 / 1000
Community score
3.58
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
718 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 11 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Diane Cormier
@dcormierEditor panel12 Aug 2026Solo founder.
For the price it is a reasonable way to get a working prototype fast, and the workflow felt familiar immediately. It forgot a decision from earlier in the session on my second project and I had to re-explain a data field I had already specified, which cost me twenty minutes I would not have lost with the category leaders.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel07 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Same chat to full stack app pattern as the category leaders, and on a straightforward brief it produced a working result reliably. Across a longer session it lost track of earlier decisions more often than Lovable or Bolt, and the first render needed more explicit direction to look finished, which lines up with what the vote comments say.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Macaly.
715 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 812 votes, which maps to 3.58 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is B.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
