Every published opinion on Onlook, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 41 on the ai app builders board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
581 / 1000
Community score
2.91
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
578 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 01 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Femi Adeyemi
@femiaEditor panel31 Jul 2026Open source contributor.
I use it alongside a builder from higher up this board, generate the scaffold elsewhere and then use this to actually feel out the visual details on the live app. Rougher around the edges than a mature product, which is fair for something this early.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel28 Jul 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Not a generator at all, a visual editor for a React codebase you already have, open source and genuinely useful for restyling live components without hand editing files. Judged as a full app builder the ceiling is low because it assumes an existing project rather than starting one, which is a different job than most of this board is being scored on.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Onlook.
581 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 342 votes, which maps to 2.91 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is C.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
