Cursor logo
S tierS tier#2 on coding agents and llms1down 1 positions this week

Cursor

The editor that made agentic coding feel normal.

908/ 1000
3,561 votes
908 / 1000
Community score
4.54 / 5
Rating equivalent
11W 5L
Head to head
19 EUR / mo
From

Last verified: 17 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026

Cursor landing page landing page, captured for the Agent Verdict board

Cursor landing page, captured 17 Aug 2026 for the board record.

At a glance

S tier

908/ 1000

3,561 votes · H2H 11W 5L

1down 1 positions this week

Strongest axes

  • Design908
  • Speed908
  • Reliability908

Weakest axes

  • Code ownership908
  • Value908
  • SEO and GEO908

The verdict

Where Cursor sits and why

Cursor put an agent inside a familiar editor and the ergonomics still lead the category. Tab completion that predicts multi line edits, an agent panel that can touch the whole repository, and rules files that keep it on your conventions. Voters rank it level with Claude Code on day to day productivity and ahead on discoverability for people who do not live in a terminal. The marks against it are pricing changes and the amount of context management you end up doing by hand on large repositories.

Strengths

  • Best in class multi line autocomplete
  • Familiar editor, near zero onboarding cost
  • Rules files keep the agent on project conventions

Weaknesses

  • Manual context management on large repositories
  • Pricing model has changed repeatedly
  • Agent occasionally over edits without asking

Community vote

Cursor scored axis by axis

Compare every tool

Design

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Speed

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Reliability

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Integrations

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Agent performance

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

API and MCP

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

SEO and GEO

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Value

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

Code ownership

908/ 1000

1 axis votes

What you get

Features on the board record

  • Agent mode across the repository
  • Predictive multi line tab completion
  • Project rules and memories
  • MCP support
  • Background agents

Pricing

What Cursor costs

Free tier with limited requests. Paid plans start around 19 EUR per month, with usage based pricing above the included allowance and business tiers for teams.

Value carries 6 of the 100 points on the published weights. Prices verified 17 Aug 2026, always check the vendor page before committing.

Head to head

Cursor against the field

All duels

Opinions

What voters said about Cursor

All opinions and ratings

Agent Verdict Panel

@agentverdictEditor panel13 Aug 2026

Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.

910/ 1000

Still the best minute to minute editing experience in the category, and the multi line completion is not close. On the long tasks it needed more context management from us than the leader did, and on a large repository that manual work adds up.

Elena Petrova

@elenapEditor panel15 Aug 2026

Front end lead.

900/ 1000

The onboarding cost is zero because it is the editor I already used. Rules files keep it on our conventions. My only real complaint is that the pricing has been rewritten enough times that I no longer know what a heavy month costs.

Yusuf Kaya

16 Aug 2026

The pricing churn is real. I stopped trying to predict my monthly bill and just watch the usage dashboard instead.

Questions

Cursor FAQ

Cursor or Claude Code?

Cursor if you want the agent inside an editor you already understand. Claude Code if you want the longest unattended task horizon. The head to head vote split is published on the duel page.

Sources

What this row was checked against