Every published opinion on Cursor, newest votes first by usefulness. Reviews, opiniones and ratings from people who ran the board brief on it, plus the score and vote count that put it at number 2 on the coding agents and llms board. Editor panel entries are badged, community entries are not.
908 / 1000
Community score
4.54
Rating out of 5
2
Opinions published
905 / 1000
Average opinion score
Last verified: 17 Aug 2026 · Board updated: 19 Aug 2026
Editor panel
These are ours. The panel ran the same brief on every tool on the board so that launch scores were not empty, and each entry is badged rather than blended in. Community votes accumulate on top and will outweigh the seed as volume grows.
Agent Verdict Panel
@agentverdictEditor panel13 Aug 2026Launch testing panel, four builders running the same brief on every tool on the board.
Still the best minute to minute editing experience in the category, and the multi line completion is not close. On the long tasks it needed more context management from us than the leader did, and on a large repository that manual work adds up.
Elena Petrova
@elenapEditor panel15 Aug 2026Front end lead.
The onboarding cost is zero because it is the editor I already used. Rules files keep it on our conventions. My only real complaint is that the pricing has been rewritten enough times that I no longer know what a heavy month costs.
Yusuf Kaya
16 Aug 2026
The pricing churn is real. I stopped trying to predict my monthly bill and just watch the usage dashboard instead.
Questions
Yes. Every entry is either a community submission or an Agent Verdict panel entry from our own testing round, and panel entries are badged Editor panel so you can tell them apart. Nothing here is supplied or approved by Cursor.
908 out of 1000 on the Agent Verdict community score, from 3,561 votes, which maps to 4.54 out of 5 if you need a conventional rating scale. Its tier band is S.
Yes. Use the form on this page. Submissions are held for review before publishing, mainly to filter out competitor astroturf and vendor marketing copy, and we do not edit the substance of what you write.
Because the board score is a weighted aggregate and an individual opinion is not. Someone who cares mostly about code ownership will rate a tool very differently from the published weights, where that axis carries 3 points out of 100. Reading the disagreement is usually more informative than reading the average.
